关于“文章学”与“文学批评”的思考

Translated title of the contribution: On “Articlology” and “Literary Criticism”

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

从文献学、古代文学理论方面考察,现代“文学批评”与古代“文章学”歧异分明。郭绍虞等囿于所处时代环境,以“文章”非“文学”的先行观念为主导,试图在“文章”中清理出一种纯粹的“文学”概念,实则是不能完全成立的。实事求是地还“文章学”、“文学批评”以本来面目,是中国现代学术重建的首要工作。

According to the observation of philology and the ancient literary theories‚the author finds out that the modern “literary criticism” differs greatly from the ancient “articlology”. Guo Shao-yu‚restrained by the time he lived‚took a supposed-to-be idea of rendering “article” into ’non-literature” in the hope of clearing out some pure “literature” from “articles”‚which finds no foundations. It is the primary work of the re-construction of the modern Chinese academic world to give a faithful recognition of “articlology” and “literary criticism”.
Translated title of the contributionOn “Articlology” and “Literary Criticism”
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)31-36
Number of pages6
Journal湘南学院学报
Volume2004
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 文章学
  • 文学批评
  • 学术重建
  • articlology
  • literary criticism
  • re-construction of academic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On “Articlology” and “Literary Criticism”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this