关于“文章学”与“文学批评”的思考

从文献学、古代文学理论方面考察，现代“文学批评”与古代“文章学”歧异分明。郭绍虞等囿于所处时代环境，以“文章”非“文学”的先行观念为主导，试图在“文章”中清理出一种纯粹的“文学”概念，实则是不能完全成立的。实事求是地还“文章学”、“文学批评”以本来面目，是中国现代学术重建的首要工作。

According to the observation of philology and the ancient literary theories‚the author finds out that the modern “literary criticism” differs greatly from the ancient “articlology”. Guo Shao-yu‚restrained by the time he lived‚took a supposed-to-be idea of rendering “article” into ’non-literature” in the hope of clearing out some pure “literature” from “articles”‚which finds no foundations. It is the primary work of the re-construction of the modern Chinese academic world to give a faithful recognition of “articlology” and “literary criticism”.