《史记·越王句践世家》疏证 : 兼论《史记》“实录”与“尚奇”之矛盾

An Analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue in Historical Records: Also on the Contradiction between “Recording Facts” and “Advocating Wonders” of Historical Records

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

文章讨论了《史记》中“实录”和“爱奇”的矛盾,亦探讨此书史学性质和文学性质的边界之所在。 以《越王句践世家》为例,分析其材料之采择,多属于小说家言之成分,表达了观念主导下的历史演绎,并且其所谓历史叙述存在着故事原型,从而佐证一部《史记》很难以“实录”视之。

This paper discusses the contradiction between "recording facts" and "advocating wonders" in Historical Records, as well as the boundary between history and literature in it. An analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue shows that most of its materials are from novels, its historical development is philosophically dominated, and there is a story prototype behind the so-called historical narrative. This tells us that Historical Records is not completely a pure record of facts.
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)79-88
Journal華東師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版)
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2018

Cite this

@article{951d6509642e4fdcafde426515c757fb,
title = "《史记·越王句践世家》疏证 : 兼论《史记》“实录”与“尚奇”之矛盾: An Analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue in Historical Records: Also on the Contradiction between “Recording Facts” and “Advocating Wonders” of Historical Records",
abstract = "文章讨论了《史记》中“实录”和“爱奇”的矛盾,亦探讨此书史学性质和文学性质的边界之所在。 以《越王句践世家》为例,分析其材料之采择,多属于小说家言之成分,表达了观念主导下的历史演绎,并且其所谓历史叙述存在着故事原型,从而佐证一部《史记》很难以“实录”视之。This paper discusses the contradiction between {"}recording facts{"} and {"}advocating wonders{"} in Historical Records, as well as the boundary between history and literature in it. An analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue shows that most of its materials are from novels, its historical development is philosophically dominated, and there is a story prototype behind the so-called historical narrative. This tells us that Historical Records is not completely a pure record of facts.",
author = "汪春泓",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "9",
doi = "10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.01.006",
language = "Chinese (Traditional)",
volume = "50",
pages = "79--88",
journal = "华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)",
issn = "1000-5579",
publisher = "华东师范大学出版社",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 《史记·越王句践世家》疏证 : 兼论《史记》“实录”与“尚奇”之矛盾

T2 - An Analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue in Historical Records: Also on the Contradiction between “Recording Facts” and “Advocating Wonders” of Historical Records

AU - 汪春泓, null

PY - 2018/1/9

Y1 - 2018/1/9

N2 - 文章讨论了《史记》中“实录”和“爱奇”的矛盾,亦探讨此书史学性质和文学性质的边界之所在。 以《越王句践世家》为例,分析其材料之采择,多属于小说家言之成分,表达了观念主导下的历史演绎,并且其所谓历史叙述存在着故事原型,从而佐证一部《史记》很难以“实录”视之。This paper discusses the contradiction between "recording facts" and "advocating wonders" in Historical Records, as well as the boundary between history and literature in it. An analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue shows that most of its materials are from novels, its historical development is philosophically dominated, and there is a story prototype behind the so-called historical narrative. This tells us that Historical Records is not completely a pure record of facts.

AB - 文章讨论了《史记》中“实录”和“爱奇”的矛盾,亦探讨此书史学性质和文学性质的边界之所在。 以《越王句践世家》为例,分析其材料之采择,多属于小说家言之成分,表达了观念主导下的历史演绎,并且其所谓历史叙述存在着故事原型,从而佐证一部《史记》很难以“实录”视之。This paper discusses the contradiction between "recording facts" and "advocating wonders" in Historical Records, as well as the boundary between history and literature in it. An analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue shows that most of its materials are from novels, its historical development is philosophically dominated, and there is a story prototype behind the so-called historical narrative. This tells us that Historical Records is not completely a pure record of facts.

U2 - 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.01.006

DO - 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.01.006

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 50

SP - 79

EP - 88

JO - 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

JF - 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

SN - 1000-5579

IS - 1

ER -