Abstract
我们试图从新劳工史研究的理论和方法出发,对中国近代产业发展初期工人主体身份的演变和构成进行考察。我们将尝试对工人阶级在传统论述中的单一化、政治化形象进行反思,以近代(1919年之前)工人阶级与工人运动的相关历史资料以及相关研究文献为基础,将并非单一化的各种工人形象作为分析对象,探索地方、血缘、族群以及性别关系等是如何与近代工人主体身份认同的建构之间相互嵌入的。本文的结论是,中国近代史上的工人阶级,从它一出现开始,便不仅仅是一个劳动意义或政治意义上的单一化主体,同时更是一个操演性文化产物以及一系列实践性关系。
The emerging working class in modern China has been traditionally portrayed in a simplified and highly politicized fashion. Based on historical source materials and related literature, this paper attempted a new approach - to explore how locality, blood relationship, clan ties, gender relationship, etc., have helped to form the subjective identity of the working class. Our conclusion is that, in modern times, the working class appeared on the stage not only as a working or political entity, but, more importantly, as an evolving cultural entity.
The emerging working class in modern China has been traditionally portrayed in a simplified and highly politicized fashion. Based on historical source materials and related literature, this paper attempted a new approach - to explore how locality, blood relationship, clan ties, gender relationship, etc., have helped to form the subjective identity of the working class. Our conclusion is that, in modern times, the working class appeared on the stage not only as a working or political entity, but, more importantly, as an evolving cultural entity.
Translated title of the contribution | Dormitory labor regime:another space for labor control and resistance |
---|---|
Original language | Chinese (Simplified) |
Pages (from-to) | 106-123 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | 开放时代 = Open Times |
Volume | 2006 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |