明清以情为主的创作论 : 以华兹华斯和艾略特情感论之争为借鉴

Translated title of the contribution: Ming-Qing Emotion-focused Theories of Literary Creation : As Seen from William Wordsworth’s and T.S. Eliot’s Opposite Views of Emotion

蔡宗齐*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

明清时期论情之说丰富驳杂,无法用“言志”“缘情”二分法来归纳。参照华兹华斯和艾略特的情感论,依循创作五大阶段,可以重新辨识各类情说。明复古、公安、竟陵三派集中讨论情景互动和成文过程,带有明显的唯美倾向。反之,反复古派徐渭、李贽等人对此不屑一顾,而把注意力移至情感来源和抒情动势,认为“涉境触事”、直吐胸中块垒就是至文。清黄宗羲、沈德潜、张惠言、周济等人沿着明末郝敬“二重性情说”与“兴情说”的思路,既承继复古派对于情景结合的重视,又将道德内涵融入所谓“性灵”之中,追求诗教与审美的结合。晚清改良派和革命派则转向关注作品功用。龚自珍步反复古派后尘,致力于冲破对个性的束缚,培养有独立思想情怀的英才。鲁迅则呼吁学习浪漫诗人拜伦,激发出一种中国从未见过、足以砸碎旧世界的革命激情。以上对诸多论情之说的新辨识,可以揭示出它们既彼此对抗又相互交叠、承继的关系,加深我们对抒情传统的认识。
Translated title of the contributionMing-Qing Emotion-focused Theories of Literary Creation : As Seen from William Wordsworth’s and T.S. Eliot’s Opposite Views of Emotion
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)17-31
Number of pages15
Journal文艺研究
Volume2024
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Cite this