班馬異同 : 從《史記》至《漢書》看敍事理論到實踐之發展變異

Translated title of the contribution: The Difference Between Historical Records (史記) and Hanshu (漢書) from Theory to Practice

汪春泓*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

承襲史學史上“班馬異同論”議題,從史學理論和史學實踐兩個方面,比較、闡釋《史記》、《漢書》之不同,探索造成此種歧異之内在原因,並着重緊扣文本,來梳理前漢經生大臣藉助陰陽災異以黨同伐異之原委。其議對奏疏以至敍事等各種文體,均受此種論政、攻訐理路之影響,此種影響自然也滲透到《漢書》的寫作。因而,構成發端於《易》、《書》、《春秋》學等儒家經典,主要由董仲舒濫觴,劉向推波助瀾,以至蔚爲大觀的經學家譜系和儒學新思潮,向、歆父子於此貢獻尤著,洵爲儒學史留下不可磨滅之印記。

Translated title of the contributionThe Difference Between Historical Records (史記) and Hanshu (漢書) from Theory to Practice
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)1-53
Journal中华文史论丛
Volume2022
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • 實録
  • 陰陽災異
  • 洪範五行
  • 向、歆父子

Cite this