Abstract
有關詩「景」,常與「境」相涉,且有「虛」和「實」的分別,又常與「境界」一同討論。論者以為詩「景」與詩「境」的「虛」與「實」,並非各不相干而是相互依存的。饒宗頤(1916-)、蕭遙天、葉嘉瑩(1924-)等人分別就相關問題,提出不少有價值的見解。現代詩亦有不少以「景」入詩的作品。本論文引述上列論者的若干說法,參以段義孚就「感知」的解釋,以「景」符號化的具體特性為貫串脈絡的討論,深入探討現代詩「景」及詩「境」與「境界」的關係。
Jing 景 is an important element in Chinese poetry which has been, explicitly or implicitly, a focus of discussion among literary critics, Despite or perhaps because of its “transcendental” implications, this term has mainly been explored in classical Chinese poetry; its use in modern Chinese poetry has seldom been analyzed. The present essay attempts to utilize the literary interpretations of Jing and Jingjie 境界 of Jao Tsung-i 饒宗頤(1916- ), XiaoYao-tian 蕭遙天 and Ye Jia-ying 葉嘉瑩(1924- ), with reference also to the ideas of Tuan Yi-fu 段義孚, in order to discuss the sign of Jing via semiotic theory, according to which every interpretation relies upon the relationship between the sign and the meaning of itself.
Jing 景 is an important element in Chinese poetry which has been, explicitly or implicitly, a focus of discussion among literary critics, Despite or perhaps because of its “transcendental” implications, this term has mainly been explored in classical Chinese poetry; its use in modern Chinese poetry has seldom been analyzed. The present essay attempts to utilize the literary interpretations of Jing and Jingjie 境界 of Jao Tsung-i 饒宗頤(1916- ), XiaoYao-tian 蕭遙天 and Ye Jia-ying 葉嘉瑩(1924- ), with reference also to the ideas of Tuan Yi-fu 段義孚, in order to discuss the sign of Jing via semiotic theory, according to which every interpretation relies upon the relationship between the sign and the meaning of itself.
Original language | Chinese |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 105-120 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | 師大學報 |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Keywords
- 空間
- 記憶
- 時間
- 景
- 觀念
- Space
- Memory
- Time
- Experience
- Jing