《诗经》是押韵的是从未得到证明的假说吗? : 与李书娴、麦耘商榷

Translated title of the contribution: Is 'rhyming Shijing' a unproven hypothesis? A discussion with Li Shuxian and Maiyun

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

李书娴、麦耘两位《证"押韵"》认为"《诗经》是押韵的"这一命题一直都未得过客观的、积极的证明,是尚未证明的假说。本文则指出:首先,"《诗经》是押韵的"不是假说:其次,权且认为"《诗经》是押韵的"是假说,无论是古代的学者还是现代的学者都已客观地证明过这一"假说",其论证的思路完全符合逻辑学的假说演绎法的基本程序;特别要指出的是李书娴、麦耘二人的"论证"并未做到"非先验的"、"客观的",其论述有自相矛盾之处,是欠说服力的。
Translated title of the contributionIs 'rhyming Shijing' a unproven hypothesis? A discussion with Li Shuxian and Maiyun
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)80-94
Number of pages15
Journal中国语言学
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is 'rhyming Shijing' a unproven hypothesis? A discussion with Li Shuxian and Maiyun'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this