A behaviourally anchored rating scales approach to institutional self-assessment in higher education

James Stuart POUNDER

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Institutional self-assessment is considered to be a crucial quality assurance mechanism in higher education. However, the criteria employed in self-assessments tend to ignore the overall organisational effectiveness of the institution. This paper describes a study which employed the effectiveness criteria contained in the Competing Values Model of Organisational Effectiveness (Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1981, 1983) to produce a set of organisational effectiveness self-rating scales for Hong Kong higher educational institutions. The scales were developed using the behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS) procedure. The study produced scales which address the organisational effectiveness of an institution and appear to be a useful addition to the array of quality assurance mechanisms in higher education. The paper highlights the qualitative benefits of the scale development procedure and resulting scales and notes that the procedure could be employed, and the qualitative benefits enjoyed, in other higher educational systems.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)171-182
    Number of pages12
    JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2000

      Fingerprint

    Cite this