A fault line in ethical theory

Shyam NAIR

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

A venerable idea in the history of moral philosophy is that central among the normative notions is the notion of goodness or value. This idea, which can be found at least as early as 1903 in G.E. Moore’s Principia Ethica, claims that goodness is central in that all other normative notions can be explained in terms of it. Moore’s approach and the dominant approach to the project of explaining the normative notions of rightness and what we have reason to do is the consequentialist program. While the most famous element of this program is the consequentialist moral theory that says an act is right (i.e., permissible) just in case the outcome of that act is at least as good as the outcome of any alternative act, the consequentialist program in general hopes to similarly explain the notion of a reason in terms of goodness. So the consequentialist theory of practical reason says that an agent has more reason to do some act a than to do some act b just in case the outcome of doing a is better than the outcome of doing b.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-200
Number of pages28
JournalPhilosophical Perspectives
Volume28
Issue number1
Early online date22 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Ethical Theory
Fault
Consequentialist
Goodness
History
Moral Theory
Moral philosophy
Principia
Practical Reason
G. E. Moore

Cite this

NAIR, Shyam. / A fault line in ethical theory. In: Philosophical Perspectives. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 173-200.
@article{39f23b63410a4a3e8a831db3acf294e9,
title = "A fault line in ethical theory",
abstract = "A venerable idea in the history of moral philosophy is that central among the normative notions is the notion of goodness or value. This idea, which can be found at least as early as 1903 in G.E. Moore’s Principia Ethica, claims that goodness is central in that all other normative notions can be explained in terms of it. Moore’s approach and the dominant approach to the project of explaining the normative notions of rightness and what we have reason to do is the consequentialist program. While the most famous element of this program is the consequentialist moral theory that says an act is right (i.e., permissible) just in case the outcome of that act is at least as good as the outcome of any alternative act, the consequentialist program in general hopes to similarly explain the notion of a reason in terms of goodness. So the consequentialist theory of practical reason says that an agent has more reason to do some act a than to do some act b just in case the outcome of doing a is better than the outcome of doing b.",
author = "Shyam NAIR",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/phpe.12047",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "173--200",
journal = "Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives",
issn = "1520-8583",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

A fault line in ethical theory. / NAIR, Shyam.

In: Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 1, 12.2014, p. 173-200.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A fault line in ethical theory

AU - NAIR, Shyam

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - A venerable idea in the history of moral philosophy is that central among the normative notions is the notion of goodness or value. This idea, which can be found at least as early as 1903 in G.E. Moore’s Principia Ethica, claims that goodness is central in that all other normative notions can be explained in terms of it. Moore’s approach and the dominant approach to the project of explaining the normative notions of rightness and what we have reason to do is the consequentialist program. While the most famous element of this program is the consequentialist moral theory that says an act is right (i.e., permissible) just in case the outcome of that act is at least as good as the outcome of any alternative act, the consequentialist program in general hopes to similarly explain the notion of a reason in terms of goodness. So the consequentialist theory of practical reason says that an agent has more reason to do some act a than to do some act b just in case the outcome of doing a is better than the outcome of doing b.

AB - A venerable idea in the history of moral philosophy is that central among the normative notions is the notion of goodness or value. This idea, which can be found at least as early as 1903 in G.E. Moore’s Principia Ethica, claims that goodness is central in that all other normative notions can be explained in terms of it. Moore’s approach and the dominant approach to the project of explaining the normative notions of rightness and what we have reason to do is the consequentialist program. While the most famous element of this program is the consequentialist moral theory that says an act is right (i.e., permissible) just in case the outcome of that act is at least as good as the outcome of any alternative act, the consequentialist program in general hopes to similarly explain the notion of a reason in terms of goodness. So the consequentialist theory of practical reason says that an agent has more reason to do some act a than to do some act b just in case the outcome of doing a is better than the outcome of doing b.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3100

U2 - 10.1111/phpe.12047

DO - 10.1111/phpe.12047

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 28

SP - 173

EP - 200

JO - Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives

JF - Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives

SN - 1520-8583

IS - 1

ER -