A ‘Medieval Menagerie’ in a Progressive Era: Captive Animal Welfare and Minimal British Interventionism in Hong Kong, 1950s–1970s

Catherine S. CHAN*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Using the urban encounter with wild animals as a point of entry, this study sheds light on the feature of minimal interventionism in British colonial governance through the miserable conditions of captive animals in British Hong Kong. It aims to reveal, behind the general image of a progressive and well-ordered colonial city in the post-war decades, oft-neglected segments construed through decades of British support towards an amusement facility deemed as highly modern and educational on the surface yet cruel and destructive towards wildlife animals from within. Through understanding what the poorly-managed zoo meant to Hong Kong citizens and the British colonial administration, this study not only restores the social positioning and sufferings of animals in post-war narratives of urban modernising and progress, but also sheds light on the practice of minimal intervention in colonial administration as reflected in British refusal to actively commit to and invest in improving the wellbeing of non-human animals.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages29
JournalThe Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • British Hong Kong
  • minimal interventionism
  • human-animal relations
  • British colonialism
  • animal welfare
  • zoo history

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A ‘Medieval Menagerie’ in a Progressive Era: Captive Animal Welfare and Minimal British Interventionism in Hong Kong, 1950s–1970s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this