A multidimensional analysis of tax practitioners’ ethical judgments

C. CRUZ, William SHAFER, J. STRAWSER

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates professional tax practitioners' ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in cases involving client pressure to adopt aggressive reporting positions, an issue that has been identified as the most difficult ethical/moral problem facing public accounting practitioners. The multidimensional ethics scale (MES) was used to measure the extent to which a hypothetical behavior was consistent with five ethical philosophies (moral equity, contractualism, utilitarianism, relativism, and egoism). Responses from a sample of 67 tax professionals supported the existence of all dimensions of the MES other than egoism. Regressions of ethical judgments and behavioral intentions on the MES dimensions indicate that ethical decision making is most heavily influenced by the moral equity dimension, followed by the contractualism dimension. In contrast, the utilitarianism and relativism dimensions were only related to ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in isolated instances.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223 - 244
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tax
Ethical judgment
Multidimensional ethics scale
Behavioral intention
Relativism
Contractualism
Equity
Utilitarianism
Egoism
Public accounting
Ethical decision making
Moral philosophy

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Relativism Dimension
  • Behavioral Intention
  • Ethical Decision
  • Ethical Judgment

Cite this

@article{35a5d964c67f4dcd98a721a5b9ec753e,
title = "A multidimensional analysis of tax practitioners’ ethical judgments",
abstract = "This study investigates professional tax practitioners' ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in cases involving client pressure to adopt aggressive reporting positions, an issue that has been identified as the most difficult ethical/moral problem facing public accounting practitioners. The multidimensional ethics scale (MES) was used to measure the extent to which a hypothetical behavior was consistent with five ethical philosophies (moral equity, contractualism, utilitarianism, relativism, and egoism). Responses from a sample of 67 tax professionals supported the existence of all dimensions of the MES other than egoism. Regressions of ethical judgments and behavioral intentions on the MES dimensions indicate that ethical decision making is most heavily influenced by the moral equity dimension, followed by the contractualism dimension. In contrast, the utilitarianism and relativism dimensions were only related to ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in isolated instances.",
keywords = "Economic Growth, Relativism Dimension, Behavioral Intention, Ethical Decision, Ethical Judgment",
author = "C. CRUZ and William SHAFER and J. STRAWSER",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1023/A:1006140809998",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "223 -- 244",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

A multidimensional analysis of tax practitioners’ ethical judgments. / CRUZ, C.; SHAFER, William; STRAWSER, J.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 04.2000, p. 223 - 244.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multidimensional analysis of tax practitioners’ ethical judgments

AU - CRUZ, C.

AU - SHAFER, William

AU - STRAWSER, J.

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - This study investigates professional tax practitioners' ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in cases involving client pressure to adopt aggressive reporting positions, an issue that has been identified as the most difficult ethical/moral problem facing public accounting practitioners. The multidimensional ethics scale (MES) was used to measure the extent to which a hypothetical behavior was consistent with five ethical philosophies (moral equity, contractualism, utilitarianism, relativism, and egoism). Responses from a sample of 67 tax professionals supported the existence of all dimensions of the MES other than egoism. Regressions of ethical judgments and behavioral intentions on the MES dimensions indicate that ethical decision making is most heavily influenced by the moral equity dimension, followed by the contractualism dimension. In contrast, the utilitarianism and relativism dimensions were only related to ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in isolated instances.

AB - This study investigates professional tax practitioners' ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in cases involving client pressure to adopt aggressive reporting positions, an issue that has been identified as the most difficult ethical/moral problem facing public accounting practitioners. The multidimensional ethics scale (MES) was used to measure the extent to which a hypothetical behavior was consistent with five ethical philosophies (moral equity, contractualism, utilitarianism, relativism, and egoism). Responses from a sample of 67 tax professionals supported the existence of all dimensions of the MES other than egoism. Regressions of ethical judgments and behavioral intentions on the MES dimensions indicate that ethical decision making is most heavily influenced by the moral equity dimension, followed by the contractualism dimension. In contrast, the utilitarianism and relativism dimensions were only related to ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in isolated instances.

KW - Economic Growth

KW - Relativism Dimension

KW - Behavioral Intention

KW - Ethical Decision

KW - Ethical Judgment

U2 - 10.1023/A:1006140809998

DO - 10.1023/A:1006140809998

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 24

SP - 223

EP - 244

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 3

ER -