A new welfare regime in the making? Paternalistic welfare pragmatism in China

Ka Ho MOK, Jiwei QIAN*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

Since 2003, the Chinese government has been increasing its social expenditure and initiated new social welfare programmes to provide universal social protection and meet citizens’ welfare needs. This article uses the wider socio-economic and socio-political contexts to critically examine whether there is a new welfare regime on the rise in China, with a particular reference to whether the increase in social expenditure has really marked a new welfare philosophy or prompted the transformation of China into a protective welfare regime. By analysing prefecture-level data for government expenditures in education, health, social security and assistance programmes between 2003 and 2012, we show a continuation of the Chinese welfare regime in ‘paternalistic welfare pragmatism’ for two reasons. First, government social expenditures are set on the basis of the prefecture-level government’s fiscal capacity. Second, variations of welfare programmes are associated with the dichotomy between the urban formal and informal sectors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-114
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of European Social Policy
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date26 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

pragmatism
expenditure
welfare
China
social expenditures
public spending
social security
health education
informal sector
social assistance
programme
social welfare
expenditures
citizen
health
economics
education

Keywords

  • China
  • informal sector
  • inter-governmental relation
  • paternalistic welfare pragmatism
  • social policy
  • welfare regime

Cite this

@article{edf1993314a44922bf4f7101b9680ca9,
title = "A new welfare regime in the making? Paternalistic welfare pragmatism in China",
abstract = "Since 2003, the Chinese government has been increasing its social expenditure and initiated new social welfare programmes to provide universal social protection and meet citizens’ welfare needs. This article uses the wider socio-economic and socio-political contexts to critically examine whether there is a new welfare regime on the rise in China, with a particular reference to whether the increase in social expenditure has really marked a new welfare philosophy or prompted the transformation of China into a protective welfare regime. By analysing prefecture-level data for government expenditures in education, health, social security and assistance programmes between 2003 and 2012, we show a continuation of the Chinese welfare regime in ‘paternalistic welfare pragmatism’ for two reasons. First, government social expenditures are set on the basis of the prefecture-level government’s fiscal capacity. Second, variations of welfare programmes are associated with the dichotomy between the urban formal and informal sectors.",
keywords = "China, informal sector, inter-governmental relation, paternalistic welfare pragmatism, social policy, welfare regime",
author = "MOK, {Ka Ho} and Jiwei QIAN",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0958928718767603",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "100--114",
journal = "Journal of European Social Policy",
issn = "0958-9287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

A new welfare regime in the making? Paternalistic welfare pragmatism in China. / MOK, Ka Ho; QIAN, Jiwei.

In: Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 100-114.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new welfare regime in the making? Paternalistic welfare pragmatism in China

AU - MOK, Ka Ho

AU - QIAN, Jiwei

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Since 2003, the Chinese government has been increasing its social expenditure and initiated new social welfare programmes to provide universal social protection and meet citizens’ welfare needs. This article uses the wider socio-economic and socio-political contexts to critically examine whether there is a new welfare regime on the rise in China, with a particular reference to whether the increase in social expenditure has really marked a new welfare philosophy or prompted the transformation of China into a protective welfare regime. By analysing prefecture-level data for government expenditures in education, health, social security and assistance programmes between 2003 and 2012, we show a continuation of the Chinese welfare regime in ‘paternalistic welfare pragmatism’ for two reasons. First, government social expenditures are set on the basis of the prefecture-level government’s fiscal capacity. Second, variations of welfare programmes are associated with the dichotomy between the urban formal and informal sectors.

AB - Since 2003, the Chinese government has been increasing its social expenditure and initiated new social welfare programmes to provide universal social protection and meet citizens’ welfare needs. This article uses the wider socio-economic and socio-political contexts to critically examine whether there is a new welfare regime on the rise in China, with a particular reference to whether the increase in social expenditure has really marked a new welfare philosophy or prompted the transformation of China into a protective welfare regime. By analysing prefecture-level data for government expenditures in education, health, social security and assistance programmes between 2003 and 2012, we show a continuation of the Chinese welfare regime in ‘paternalistic welfare pragmatism’ for two reasons. First, government social expenditures are set on the basis of the prefecture-level government’s fiscal capacity. Second, variations of welfare programmes are associated with the dichotomy between the urban formal and informal sectors.

KW - China

KW - informal sector

KW - inter-governmental relation

KW - paternalistic welfare pragmatism

KW - social policy

KW - welfare regime

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046730661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0958928718767603

DO - 10.1177/0958928718767603

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 29

SP - 100

EP - 114

JO - Journal of European Social Policy

JF - Journal of European Social Policy

SN - 0958-9287

IS - 1

ER -