A puzzle for modal realism

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


Modal realists face a puzzle. For modal realism to be justified, modal realists need to be able to give a successful reduction of modality. A simple argument, however, appears to show that the reduction they propose fails. In order to defend the claim that modal realism is justified, modal realists therefore need to either show that this argument fails, or show that modal realists can give another reduction of modality that is successful. I argue that modal realists cannot do either of these things and that, as a result, modal realism is unjustified and should be rejected.
Original languageEnglish
Article number19
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalPhilosophers' Imprint
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'A puzzle for modal realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this