A successful case is made for granting refugee status to a woman fleeing her own country to protect her daughter from female genital mutilation

James Andrew RICE

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In November 1996, the UNHCR office in Hong Kong recognized a claim for asylum made by a woman who along with her two children had fled from her native Ghana because she feared that her daughter would be harmed by being subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM). The practice of FGM poses a significant harm to women in Sub Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East and Asia. FGM persists because of cultural and religious factors. Despite this, it is morally wrong because it is done by in large without consent, and it inflicts severe pain and lasting ill effects on those it is done to. This case, relying on other decisions made by Canadian and the United States immigration boards is a significant development in the protection of girls and women who are subjected to FGM.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalGonzaga Journal of International Law
    Volume4
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

    Fingerprint

    refugee
    religious factors
    UNHCR
    cultural factors
    Ghana
    Middle East
    pain
    Hong Kong
    immigration

    Cite this

    @article{f38678e85ed044bda27472a82d550616,
    title = "A successful case is made for granting refugee status to a woman fleeing her own country to protect her daughter from female genital mutilation",
    abstract = "In November 1996, the UNHCR office in Hong Kong recognized a claim for asylum made by a woman who along with her two children had fled from her native Ghana because she feared that her daughter would be harmed by being subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM). The practice of FGM poses a significant harm to women in Sub Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East and Asia. FGM persists because of cultural and religious factors. Despite this, it is morally wrong because it is done by in large without consent, and it inflicts severe pain and lasting ill effects on those it is done to. This case, relying on other decisions made by Canadian and the United States immigration boards is a significant development in the protection of girls and women who are subjected to FGM.",
    author = "RICE, {James Andrew}",
    year = "2000",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "4",
    journal = "Gonzaga Journal of International Law",
    issn = "1942-9193",

    }

    A successful case is made for granting refugee status to a woman fleeing her own country to protect her daughter from female genital mutilation. / RICE, James Andrew.

    In: Gonzaga Journal of International Law, Vol. 4, 01.01.2000.

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A successful case is made for granting refugee status to a woman fleeing her own country to protect her daughter from female genital mutilation

    AU - RICE, James Andrew

    PY - 2000/1/1

    Y1 - 2000/1/1

    N2 - In November 1996, the UNHCR office in Hong Kong recognized a claim for asylum made by a woman who along with her two children had fled from her native Ghana because she feared that her daughter would be harmed by being subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM). The practice of FGM poses a significant harm to women in Sub Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East and Asia. FGM persists because of cultural and religious factors. Despite this, it is morally wrong because it is done by in large without consent, and it inflicts severe pain and lasting ill effects on those it is done to. This case, relying on other decisions made by Canadian and the United States immigration boards is a significant development in the protection of girls and women who are subjected to FGM.

    AB - In November 1996, the UNHCR office in Hong Kong recognized a claim for asylum made by a woman who along with her two children had fled from her native Ghana because she feared that her daughter would be harmed by being subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM). The practice of FGM poses a significant harm to women in Sub Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East and Asia. FGM persists because of cultural and religious factors. Despite this, it is morally wrong because it is done by in large without consent, and it inflicts severe pain and lasting ill effects on those it is done to. This case, relying on other decisions made by Canadian and the United States immigration boards is a significant development in the protection of girls and women who are subjected to FGM.

    UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/747

    M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

    VL - 4

    JO - Gonzaga Journal of International Law

    JF - Gonzaga Journal of International Law

    SN - 1942-9193

    ER -