Acceptance-Based or Teaching-Based Rule Consequentialism?

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Is an action obligatory if and only if it is prescribed by a code that is the best to be taught to the next generation? This paper discusses whether this version of rule consequentialism is superior to acceptance-based formulations in some relevant respects. Ultimately, I conclude that, given certain requirements rule consequentialism should ideally meet, teaching-based formulations are no better than acceptance-based ones.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-70
Number of pages8
JournalRatio
Volume38
Issue number1
Early online date24 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Ratio published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Funding

Lingnan University - Faculty Research Grant (Faculty of Arts, #101919)

Keywords

  • demandingness
  • ideal world objection
  • moral education
  • partial compilance
  • rule consequentialism
  • partial compliance

Cite this