Administrative or survey data for measuring organizational performance: what's the difference?

Gene A. BREWER, Richard M. WALKER

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsConference Paper (other)Other Conference Paperpeer-review

Abstract

Debate about the best way to measure performance in studies of management in public organizations is longstanding. We address this topic through a review of the evidence from 93 studies that use administrative and/or survey measures of organizational performance. We find that administrative data typically reflect the performance judgements of government (at the central, regional and local level) and regulators, while survey data is based on the perceptions of citizens, service users and public sector managers. We undertake a critical review of the twelve articles that use both administrative and survey measures of organizational performance. This reveals limited differences in the impact of management variables on the two types of performance measures. However, in those studies using survey measures, management variables are more likely to have a positive link with the performance judgements of service consumers than the judgements of managers themselves. This implies that public managers may underestimate their impact on citizens’ perceptions of organizational performance.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010
Externally publishedYes
EventThe 14th International Research Society for Public Management Conference - Berne, Switzerland
Duration: 7 Apr 20109 Apr 2010

Conference

ConferenceThe 14th International Research Society for Public Management Conference
Abbreviated titleIRSPM 2010
Country/TerritorySwitzerland
CityBerne
Period7/04/109/04/10

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Administrative or survey data for measuring organizational performance: what's the difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this