After massification and response to internationalization: Quality assurance of higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong

Ka Ho, Joshua MOK, Sheng Ju CHAN

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

In the last two decades, higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong has experienced significant transformations. The massification of higher education in these two Asian societies, together with the drive for internationalization, has resulted in the institutionalization of QA in their higher education systems. Overall, the introduction of QA mechanisms is becoming increasingly popular as higher education is getting more competitive, especially when universities are subject to various forms of international benchmarking and global ranking. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, both the Taiwan and Hong Kong governments have adopted different measures to assure the high quality of learning and teaching, research, and services delivered by their HEIs. This chapter sets out against the policy context outlined above to examine the changing landscape of QA regimes in Taiwan and Hong Kong, with particular reference to how the implementation of QA exercises has become part and parcel of university governance. This chapter focuses on three aspects of QA in these two cases. The first is the changing role of the various actors such as governments, QA agencies, and HEIs in relation to QA of higher education. The second is to examine how HEIs are being monitored and evaluated. And, the third aspect is to examine how evaluation results are being used indicating who, among the various actors, has the dominant power over how the universities should be run.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages423-438
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781137487391
ISBN (Print)9781137487384
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

quality assurance
internationalization
Hong Kong
Taiwan
university
education
teaching research
benchmarking
government agency
institutionalization
education system
competitiveness
ranking
regime
governance
evaluation
society
learning

Cite this

MOK, K. H. J., & CHAN, S. J. (2016). After massification and response to internationalization: Quality assurance of higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong. In The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education (pp. 423-438). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48739-1_28
MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua ; CHAN, Sheng Ju. / After massification and response to internationalization: Quality assurance of higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong. The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. pp. 423-438
@inbook{d239d88990534620812072d254329943,
title = "After massification and response to internationalization: Quality assurance of higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong",
abstract = "In the last two decades, higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong has experienced significant transformations. The massification of higher education in these two Asian societies, together with the drive for internationalization, has resulted in the institutionalization of QA in their higher education systems. Overall, the introduction of QA mechanisms is becoming increasingly popular as higher education is getting more competitive, especially when universities are subject to various forms of international benchmarking and global ranking. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, both the Taiwan and Hong Kong governments have adopted different measures to assure the high quality of learning and teaching, research, and services delivered by their HEIs. This chapter sets out against the policy context outlined above to examine the changing landscape of QA regimes in Taiwan and Hong Kong, with particular reference to how the implementation of QA exercises has become part and parcel of university governance. This chapter focuses on three aspects of QA in these two cases. The first is the changing role of the various actors such as governments, QA agencies, and HEIs in relation to QA of higher education. The second is to examine how HEIs are being monitored and evaluated. And, the third aspect is to examine how evaluation results are being used indicating who, among the various actors, has the dominant power over how the universities should be run.",
author = "MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua} and CHAN, {Sheng Ju}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1057/978-1-137-48739-1_28",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781137487384",
pages = "423--438",
booktitle = "The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

After massification and response to internationalization: Quality assurance of higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong. / MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua; CHAN, Sheng Ju.

The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. p. 423-438.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - After massification and response to internationalization: Quality assurance of higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

AU - CHAN, Sheng Ju

PY - 2016/10/6

Y1 - 2016/10/6

N2 - In the last two decades, higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong has experienced significant transformations. The massification of higher education in these two Asian societies, together with the drive for internationalization, has resulted in the institutionalization of QA in their higher education systems. Overall, the introduction of QA mechanisms is becoming increasingly popular as higher education is getting more competitive, especially when universities are subject to various forms of international benchmarking and global ranking. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, both the Taiwan and Hong Kong governments have adopted different measures to assure the high quality of learning and teaching, research, and services delivered by their HEIs. This chapter sets out against the policy context outlined above to examine the changing landscape of QA regimes in Taiwan and Hong Kong, with particular reference to how the implementation of QA exercises has become part and parcel of university governance. This chapter focuses on three aspects of QA in these two cases. The first is the changing role of the various actors such as governments, QA agencies, and HEIs in relation to QA of higher education. The second is to examine how HEIs are being monitored and evaluated. And, the third aspect is to examine how evaluation results are being used indicating who, among the various actors, has the dominant power over how the universities should be run.

AB - In the last two decades, higher education in Taiwan and Hong Kong has experienced significant transformations. The massification of higher education in these two Asian societies, together with the drive for internationalization, has resulted in the institutionalization of QA in their higher education systems. Overall, the introduction of QA mechanisms is becoming increasingly popular as higher education is getting more competitive, especially when universities are subject to various forms of international benchmarking and global ranking. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, both the Taiwan and Hong Kong governments have adopted different measures to assure the high quality of learning and teaching, research, and services delivered by their HEIs. This chapter sets out against the policy context outlined above to examine the changing landscape of QA regimes in Taiwan and Hong Kong, with particular reference to how the implementation of QA exercises has become part and parcel of university governance. This chapter focuses on three aspects of QA in these two cases. The first is the changing role of the various actors such as governments, QA agencies, and HEIs in relation to QA of higher education. The second is to examine how HEIs are being monitored and evaluated. And, the third aspect is to examine how evaluation results are being used indicating who, among the various actors, has the dominant power over how the universities should be run.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044876126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5276

U2 - 10.1057/978-1-137-48739-1_28

DO - 10.1057/978-1-137-48739-1_28

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9781137487384

SP - 423

EP - 438

BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -