Aggressive Humor and Social Connectedness : The Moderating Roles of Subjective Social Status and Gender

Ting Kin NG*, Ting Hin LEE

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aggressive humor has been conceived as a maladaptive humor style that jeopardizes social relationships. However, past studies have yielded inconsistent findings regarding the detrimental effects of aggressive humor on social relationships. This study attempts to advance the existing literature by examining the gender difference in the moderating role of subjective social status in the association between aggressive humor and social connectedness. Participants were 228 (53.1% female) adults aged from 18 to 53 years (M = 23.19, SD = 6.43). The hypothesized moderated moderation effect was significant, suggesting that gender significantly moderated the moderating effect of subjective social status on the association between aggressive humor and social connectedness. Subjective social status significantly moderated the association between aggressive humor and social connectedness for men but not for women. For men, aggressive humor was negatively associated with social connectedness when subjective social status was low or medium, but the association was not significant when subjective social status was high. For women, aggressive humor was not associated with social connectedness regardless of subjective social status. Implications of the findings are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-272
Number of pages16
JournalThe Journal of Psychology
Volume158
Issue number4
Early online date9 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • Gender issues
  • humor
  • interpersonal relations
  • social interaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aggressive Humor and Social Connectedness : The Moderating Roles of Subjective Social Status and Gender'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this