American sociology and the limits of partisan expertise

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

Stephen Turner's brief history of American sociology culminates in a description of its current state and prospects. The collapse of the behavioral science ideal, and the aversion to big theory, Turner argues, suggests that sociology is ever more approximating what it was in its early reformist days: a partisan endeavor, oriented to social justice, guided by and legitimized by fact-producing techniques of broadly sociological provenance. The demographic ascendancy of women in the discipline, Turner continues, is likely to accentuate this development and will parallel, rather than transform, the caste-like exclusivity of the top twenty sociology departments and the AJS/ASR nexus. This article examines Turner's analogy of previous partisan expertise with its contemporary manifestations. It argues that the analogy is misleading, and that the 'post-normal' sociology Turner sketches is of doubtful expertise precisely because of its antipathy to serious critical thought and open enquiry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-50
Number of pages11
JournalThe American Sociologist
Volume46
Issue number1
Early online date7 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

sociology
expertise
behavioral science
caste
social justice
history

Cite this

@article{144adae2b3b34a93a4e57074bb3a24fe,
title = "American sociology and the limits of partisan expertise",
abstract = "Stephen Turner's brief history of American sociology culminates in a description of its current state and prospects. The collapse of the behavioral science ideal, and the aversion to big theory, Turner argues, suggests that sociology is ever more approximating what it was in its early reformist days: a partisan endeavor, oriented to social justice, guided by and legitimized by fact-producing techniques of broadly sociological provenance. The demographic ascendancy of women in the discipline, Turner continues, is likely to accentuate this development and will parallel, rather than transform, the caste-like exclusivity of the top twenty sociology departments and the AJS/ASR nexus. This article examines Turner's analogy of previous partisan expertise with its contemporary manifestations. It argues that the analogy is misleading, and that the 'post-normal' sociology Turner sketches is of doubtful expertise precisely because of its antipathy to serious critical thought and open enquiry.",
author = "BAEHR, {William Peter}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12108-014-9244-7",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "40--50",
journal = "The American Sociologist",
issn = "0003-1232",
publisher = "Transaction Publishers",
number = "1",

}

American sociology and the limits of partisan expertise. / BAEHR, William Peter.

In: The American Sociologist, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 40-50.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - American sociology and the limits of partisan expertise

AU - BAEHR, William Peter

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Stephen Turner's brief history of American sociology culminates in a description of its current state and prospects. The collapse of the behavioral science ideal, and the aversion to big theory, Turner argues, suggests that sociology is ever more approximating what it was in its early reformist days: a partisan endeavor, oriented to social justice, guided by and legitimized by fact-producing techniques of broadly sociological provenance. The demographic ascendancy of women in the discipline, Turner continues, is likely to accentuate this development and will parallel, rather than transform, the caste-like exclusivity of the top twenty sociology departments and the AJS/ASR nexus. This article examines Turner's analogy of previous partisan expertise with its contemporary manifestations. It argues that the analogy is misleading, and that the 'post-normal' sociology Turner sketches is of doubtful expertise precisely because of its antipathy to serious critical thought and open enquiry.

AB - Stephen Turner's brief history of American sociology culminates in a description of its current state and prospects. The collapse of the behavioral science ideal, and the aversion to big theory, Turner argues, suggests that sociology is ever more approximating what it was in its early reformist days: a partisan endeavor, oriented to social justice, guided by and legitimized by fact-producing techniques of broadly sociological provenance. The demographic ascendancy of women in the discipline, Turner continues, is likely to accentuate this development and will parallel, rather than transform, the caste-like exclusivity of the top twenty sociology departments and the AJS/ASR nexus. This article examines Turner's analogy of previous partisan expertise with its contemporary manifestations. It argues that the analogy is misleading, and that the 'post-normal' sociology Turner sketches is of doubtful expertise precisely because of its antipathy to serious critical thought and open enquiry.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1953

U2 - 10.1007/s12108-014-9244-7

DO - 10.1007/s12108-014-9244-7

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 46

SP - 40

EP - 50

JO - The American Sociologist

JF - The American Sociologist

SN - 0003-1232

IS - 1

ER -