An exploratory study of auditors’ perceptions of sanction threats

William SHAFER, R. E. MORRIS

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ongoing debate regarding the desirability of extending certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to auditors of nonpublic companies creates a need for a better understanding of the effectiveness of existing sanctioning mechanisms in the accounting profession. To provide input on this issue, the current paper reports the results of an exploratory study of perceived sanction threats among CPA/auditors employed by small public accounting firms. A survey of AICPA members in public practice was conducted to assess the perceived threat of sanctions for auditor acquiescence in a client earnings manipulation scheme. The results indicate that, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley law, CPAs perceived a relatively high threat from many types of professional sanctions, and that most sanction threats appeared to act as a deterrent to fraud. However, the perceived likelihood of criminal conviction and CPA license revocation were relatively low. The findings also indicate that the materiality of the financial statement ma
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209 - 231
Number of pages23
JournalResearch in Accounting Regulation
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

sanction
threat
fraud
license
manipulation
profession
act
firm
Law
Exploratory study
Threat
Auditors
Sanctions

Cite this

@article{1f30839c13254f34a09083f46f0be476,
title = "An exploratory study of auditors’ perceptions of sanction threats",
abstract = "The ongoing debate regarding the desirability of extending certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to auditors of nonpublic companies creates a need for a better understanding of the effectiveness of existing sanctioning mechanisms in the accounting profession. To provide input on this issue, the current paper reports the results of an exploratory study of perceived sanction threats among CPA/auditors employed by small public accounting firms. A survey of AICPA members in public practice was conducted to assess the perceived threat of sanctions for auditor acquiescence in a client earnings manipulation scheme. The results indicate that, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley law, CPAs perceived a relatively high threat from many types of professional sanctions, and that most sanction threats appeared to act as a deterrent to fraud. However, the perceived likelihood of criminal conviction and CPA license revocation were relatively low. The findings also indicate that the materiality of the financial statement ma",
author = "William SHAFER and MORRIS, {R. E.}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1016/S1052-0457(04)17010-0",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "209 -- 231",
journal = "Research in Accounting Regulation",
issn = "1052-0457",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

An exploratory study of auditors’ perceptions of sanction threats. / SHAFER, William; MORRIS, R. E.

In: Research in Accounting Regulation, Vol. 17, 2004, p. 209 - 231.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An exploratory study of auditors’ perceptions of sanction threats

AU - SHAFER, William

AU - MORRIS, R. E.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The ongoing debate regarding the desirability of extending certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to auditors of nonpublic companies creates a need for a better understanding of the effectiveness of existing sanctioning mechanisms in the accounting profession. To provide input on this issue, the current paper reports the results of an exploratory study of perceived sanction threats among CPA/auditors employed by small public accounting firms. A survey of AICPA members in public practice was conducted to assess the perceived threat of sanctions for auditor acquiescence in a client earnings manipulation scheme. The results indicate that, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley law, CPAs perceived a relatively high threat from many types of professional sanctions, and that most sanction threats appeared to act as a deterrent to fraud. However, the perceived likelihood of criminal conviction and CPA license revocation were relatively low. The findings also indicate that the materiality of the financial statement ma

AB - The ongoing debate regarding the desirability of extending certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to auditors of nonpublic companies creates a need for a better understanding of the effectiveness of existing sanctioning mechanisms in the accounting profession. To provide input on this issue, the current paper reports the results of an exploratory study of perceived sanction threats among CPA/auditors employed by small public accounting firms. A survey of AICPA members in public practice was conducted to assess the perceived threat of sanctions for auditor acquiescence in a client earnings manipulation scheme. The results indicate that, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley law, CPAs perceived a relatively high threat from many types of professional sanctions, and that most sanction threats appeared to act as a deterrent to fraud. However, the perceived likelihood of criminal conviction and CPA license revocation were relatively low. The findings also indicate that the materiality of the financial statement ma

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-65249131302&doi=10.1016%2fS1052-0457%2804%2917010-0&partnerID=40&md5=31fa36fc424e824768aa03003934af65

U2 - 10.1016/S1052-0457(04)17010-0

DO - 10.1016/S1052-0457(04)17010-0

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 17

SP - 209

EP - 231

JO - Research in Accounting Regulation

JF - Research in Accounting Regulation

SN - 1052-0457

ER -