An intermediary enhances out-group trust and in-group profit expectation of Chinese but not Australians

Jiawen YE, Sik Hung Ng

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

In this research, we made a theoretical distinction between direct and intermediary-mediated trust situations, and conducted a cross-cultural (Chinese vs. Australians) investment trust game to test the overlooked effects of an intermediary on investors' trust decisions, with respect to how much to invest in and expect from trustees. Compared to situations of direct trust, a nominal intermediary increased the number of Chinese investors expecting in-group trustees to repay a profit on their investments (Hypothesis 1) and raised their level of investment in out-group trustees (Hypothesis 2). These results applied to Chinese, but not Australians in support of the proposal that a nominal intermediary would serve as a cue to activate different cultural stereotypes of the functions and meanings of an intermediary with respect to trust and expectation of reciprocity. Coexisting with these culture-specific effects of an intermediary, the minimal categorisation of people into in-group and out-group on trivial grounds leads to a highly significant in-group favouritism in investment levels of both Chinese and Australians (Hypothesis 3).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-196
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology
Volume52
Issue number3
Early online date27 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trustees
Cues
Intermediaries
Profit
Research
Investors

Keywords

  • Cultural difference
  • Intergroup reciprocity
  • Intergroup trust
  • Intermediary

Cite this

@article{92034318effe4fc8a91598a4f6281555,
title = "An intermediary enhances out-group trust and in-group profit expectation of Chinese but not Australians",
abstract = "In this research, we made a theoretical distinction between direct and intermediary-mediated trust situations, and conducted a cross-cultural (Chinese vs. Australians) investment trust game to test the overlooked effects of an intermediary on investors' trust decisions, with respect to how much to invest in and expect from trustees. Compared to situations of direct trust, a nominal intermediary increased the number of Chinese investors expecting in-group trustees to repay a profit on their investments (Hypothesis 1) and raised their level of investment in out-group trustees (Hypothesis 2). These results applied to Chinese, but not Australians in support of the proposal that a nominal intermediary would serve as a cue to activate different cultural stereotypes of the functions and meanings of an intermediary with respect to trust and expectation of reciprocity. Coexisting with these culture-specific effects of an intermediary, the minimal categorisation of people into in-group and out-group on trivial grounds leads to a highly significant in-group favouritism in investment levels of both Chinese and Australians (Hypothesis 3).",
keywords = "Cultural difference, Intergroup reciprocity, Intergroup trust, Intermediary",
author = "Jiawen YE and Ng, {Sik Hung}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ijop.12199",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "189--196",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0020-7594",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

An intermediary enhances out-group trust and in-group profit expectation of Chinese but not Australians. / YE, Jiawen; Ng, Sik Hung.

In: International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 189-196.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - An intermediary enhances out-group trust and in-group profit expectation of Chinese but not Australians

AU - YE, Jiawen

AU - Ng, Sik Hung

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - In this research, we made a theoretical distinction between direct and intermediary-mediated trust situations, and conducted a cross-cultural (Chinese vs. Australians) investment trust game to test the overlooked effects of an intermediary on investors' trust decisions, with respect to how much to invest in and expect from trustees. Compared to situations of direct trust, a nominal intermediary increased the number of Chinese investors expecting in-group trustees to repay a profit on their investments (Hypothesis 1) and raised their level of investment in out-group trustees (Hypothesis 2). These results applied to Chinese, but not Australians in support of the proposal that a nominal intermediary would serve as a cue to activate different cultural stereotypes of the functions and meanings of an intermediary with respect to trust and expectation of reciprocity. Coexisting with these culture-specific effects of an intermediary, the minimal categorisation of people into in-group and out-group on trivial grounds leads to a highly significant in-group favouritism in investment levels of both Chinese and Australians (Hypothesis 3).

AB - In this research, we made a theoretical distinction between direct and intermediary-mediated trust situations, and conducted a cross-cultural (Chinese vs. Australians) investment trust game to test the overlooked effects of an intermediary on investors' trust decisions, with respect to how much to invest in and expect from trustees. Compared to situations of direct trust, a nominal intermediary increased the number of Chinese investors expecting in-group trustees to repay a profit on their investments (Hypothesis 1) and raised their level of investment in out-group trustees (Hypothesis 2). These results applied to Chinese, but not Australians in support of the proposal that a nominal intermediary would serve as a cue to activate different cultural stereotypes of the functions and meanings of an intermediary with respect to trust and expectation of reciprocity. Coexisting with these culture-specific effects of an intermediary, the minimal categorisation of people into in-group and out-group on trivial grounds leads to a highly significant in-group favouritism in investment levels of both Chinese and Australians (Hypothesis 3).

KW - Cultural difference

KW - Intergroup reciprocity

KW - Intergroup trust

KW - Intermediary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938152467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/7538

U2 - 10.1002/ijop.12199

DO - 10.1002/ijop.12199

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

C2 - 26212598

VL - 52

SP - 189

EP - 196

JO - International Journal of Psychology

JF - International Journal of Psychology

SN - 0020-7594

IS - 3

ER -