Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

Marquis’ future-like-ours argument against the morality of abortion assumes animalism—a family of theories according to which we are animals. Such an assumption is theoretically useful for various reasons, e.g., because it provides the theoretical underpinning for a reply to the contraception-abstinence objection. However, the connection between the future-like-ours argument and one popular version of animalism can prove lethal to the former, or so I argue in this paper.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-332
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Ethics
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date29 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Animalism
Abortion
Morality
Contraception
Animals

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Identity
  • Personal Ontology
  • Future-like-ours Arguments
  • Personal identity
  • Biological Individuality
  • Metaphysics
  • Applied Ethics
  • Future-like-ours argument
  • Biological individuality
  • Animalism
  • Personal ontology

Cite this

@article{3bcc11c4712440cab716f704114c6fdf,
title = "Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours",
abstract = "Marquis’ future-like-ours argument against the morality of abortion assumes animalism—a family of theories according to which we are animals. Such an assumption is theoretically useful for various reasons, e.g., because it provides the theoretical underpinning for a reply to the contraception-abstinence objection. However, the connection between the future-like-ours argument and one popular version of animalism can prove lethal to the former, or so I argue in this paper.",
keywords = "Abortion, Identity, Personal Ontology, Future-like-ours Arguments, Personal identity, Biological Individuality, Metaphysics, Applied Ethics, Future-like-ours argument, Biological individuality, Animalism, Personal ontology",
author = "Andrea SAUCHELLI",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10892-019-09298-y",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "317--332",
journal = "Journal of Ethics",
issn = "1382-4554",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours. / SAUCHELLI, Andrea.

In: Journal of Ethics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 09.2019, p. 317-332.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours

AU - SAUCHELLI, Andrea

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Marquis’ future-like-ours argument against the morality of abortion assumes animalism—a family of theories according to which we are animals. Such an assumption is theoretically useful for various reasons, e.g., because it provides the theoretical underpinning for a reply to the contraception-abstinence objection. However, the connection between the future-like-ours argument and one popular version of animalism can prove lethal to the former, or so I argue in this paper.

AB - Marquis’ future-like-ours argument against the morality of abortion assumes animalism—a family of theories according to which we are animals. Such an assumption is theoretically useful for various reasons, e.g., because it provides the theoretical underpinning for a reply to the contraception-abstinence objection. However, the connection between the future-like-ours argument and one popular version of animalism can prove lethal to the former, or so I argue in this paper.

KW - Abortion

KW - Identity

KW - Personal Ontology

KW - Future-like-ours Arguments

KW - Personal identity

KW - Biological Individuality

KW - Metaphysics

KW - Applied Ethics

KW - Future-like-ours argument

KW - Biological individuality

KW - Animalism

KW - Personal ontology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068339685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10892-019-09298-y

DO - 10.1007/s10892-019-09298-y

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 23

SP - 317

EP - 332

JO - Journal of Ethics

JF - Journal of Ethics

SN - 1382-4554

IS - 3

ER -