Are investment managers investing ethically at a disadvantage?

Vigdis BOASSON, Joseph CHENG, Emil BOASSON

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    Abstract

    It is the fiduciary duty of the investment managers to maximize returns at a reasonable level of risk for their clients. The greater the number of investment opportunities, the more likely that the managers will achieve the objective of maximizing return and minimizing risk. Ethical investing involves screening out certain investments on moral grounds. Such practice would inevitably lead to the exclusions of some potentially profitable businesses and thus reduces the number of investment opportunities. The logical question one would ask is whether investment managers who follow ethical investing principle are at a disadvantage vis-à-vis other managers whose investment options are not restricted. This paper examines this issue by analyzing the performance of faith-based funds which adopt the toughest exclusionary screens. Our results show that their performances are not worse than their unrestricted counterparts. This implies that investment managers are not shortchanging their clients even though their investment choices are restricted by their ethical principles.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)56-65
    Number of pages10
    JournalThe Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship
    Volume9
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2004

    Fingerprint

    Managers
    Investing
    Disadvantage
    Ethical investing
    Investment opportunities
    Risk and return
    Fiduciary duty
    Faith
    Logic
    Exclusion
    Investment choice
    Ethical principles
    Screening

    Cite this

    BOASSON, Vigdis ; CHENG, Joseph ; BOASSON, Emil. / Are investment managers investing ethically at a disadvantage?. In: The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 2004 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 56-65.
    @article{9e6cb9b63f95421aad00a0dec3d2ad6b,
    title = "Are investment managers investing ethically at a disadvantage?",
    abstract = "It is the fiduciary duty of the investment managers to maximize returns at a reasonable level of risk for their clients. The greater the number of investment opportunities, the more likely that the managers will achieve the objective of maximizing return and minimizing risk. Ethical investing involves screening out certain investments on moral grounds. Such practice would inevitably lead to the exclusions of some potentially profitable businesses and thus reduces the number of investment opportunities. The logical question one would ask is whether investment managers who follow ethical investing principle are at a disadvantage vis-{\`a}-vis other managers whose investment options are not restricted. This paper examines this issue by analyzing the performance of faith-based funds which adopt the toughest exclusionary screens. Our results show that their performances are not worse than their unrestricted counterparts. This implies that investment managers are not shortchanging their clients even though their investment choices are restricted by their ethical principles.",
    author = "Vigdis BOASSON and Joseph CHENG and Emil BOASSON",
    year = "2004",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "56--65",
    journal = "The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship",
    issn = "1077-1158",
    number = "4",

    }

    Are investment managers investing ethically at a disadvantage? / BOASSON, Vigdis; CHENG, Joseph; BOASSON, Emil.

    In: The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.10.2004, p. 56-65.

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Are investment managers investing ethically at a disadvantage?

    AU - BOASSON, Vigdis

    AU - CHENG, Joseph

    AU - BOASSON, Emil

    PY - 2004/10/1

    Y1 - 2004/10/1

    N2 - It is the fiduciary duty of the investment managers to maximize returns at a reasonable level of risk for their clients. The greater the number of investment opportunities, the more likely that the managers will achieve the objective of maximizing return and minimizing risk. Ethical investing involves screening out certain investments on moral grounds. Such practice would inevitably lead to the exclusions of some potentially profitable businesses and thus reduces the number of investment opportunities. The logical question one would ask is whether investment managers who follow ethical investing principle are at a disadvantage vis-à-vis other managers whose investment options are not restricted. This paper examines this issue by analyzing the performance of faith-based funds which adopt the toughest exclusionary screens. Our results show that their performances are not worse than their unrestricted counterparts. This implies that investment managers are not shortchanging their clients even though their investment choices are restricted by their ethical principles.

    AB - It is the fiduciary duty of the investment managers to maximize returns at a reasonable level of risk for their clients. The greater the number of investment opportunities, the more likely that the managers will achieve the objective of maximizing return and minimizing risk. Ethical investing involves screening out certain investments on moral grounds. Such practice would inevitably lead to the exclusions of some potentially profitable businesses and thus reduces the number of investment opportunities. The logical question one would ask is whether investment managers who follow ethical investing principle are at a disadvantage vis-à-vis other managers whose investment options are not restricted. This paper examines this issue by analyzing the performance of faith-based funds which adopt the toughest exclusionary screens. Our results show that their performances are not worse than their unrestricted counterparts. This implies that investment managers are not shortchanging their clients even though their investment choices are restricted by their ethical principles.

    UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5248

    M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

    VL - 9

    SP - 56

    EP - 65

    JO - The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship

    JF - The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship

    SN - 1077-1158

    IS - 4

    ER -