Are unsolicited credit ratings biased downward?

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been considerable controversy over unsolicited credit ratings in recent years. Some dissatisfied issuers allege that unsolicited ratings are biased downward in contrast to solicited ratings. This is the first empirical study to analyze the controversy using pooled time-series cross-sectional data of 265 firms in 15 countries from Standard and Poor's Ratings Services (SandP's) during the period of 1998-2000. The results demonstrate that unsolicited ratings are lower. On the other hand, I also find that those issuers who choose not to obtain rating services from SandP's have weaker financial profiles. Although the difference in ratings can be explained by this significant self-selection bias, results of the Japanese sub-sample indicate that unsolicited ratings are still lower than solicited ratings after controlling for differences in sovereign risk and key financial characteristics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-614
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2003

Fingerprint

Rating
Credit rating
Empirical study
Cross-sectional data
Sovereign risk
Self-selection bias

Keywords

  • Ordered-probit model
  • Selectivity bias
  • Standard and Poor's ratings
  • Unsolicited credit ratings

Cite this

@article{139a24ad55fc454a97180223898e3add,
title = "Are unsolicited credit ratings biased downward?",
abstract = "There has been considerable controversy over unsolicited credit ratings in recent years. Some dissatisfied issuers allege that unsolicited ratings are biased downward in contrast to solicited ratings. This is the first empirical study to analyze the controversy using pooled time-series cross-sectional data of 265 firms in 15 countries from Standard and Poor's Ratings Services (SandP's) during the period of 1998-2000. The results demonstrate that unsolicited ratings are lower. On the other hand, I also find that those issuers who choose not to obtain rating services from SandP's have weaker financial profiles. Although the difference in ratings can be explained by this significant self-selection bias, results of the Japanese sub-sample indicate that unsolicited ratings are still lower than solicited ratings after controlling for differences in sovereign risk and key financial characteristics.",
keywords = "Ordered-probit model, Selectivity bias, Standard and Poor's ratings, Unsolicited credit ratings",
author = "POON, {Pui Han, Winnie}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00253-9",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "593--614",
journal = "Journal of Banking and Finance",
issn = "0378-4266",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Are unsolicited credit ratings biased downward? / POON, Pui Han, Winnie.

In: Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.04.2003, p. 593-614.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are unsolicited credit ratings biased downward?

AU - POON, Pui Han, Winnie

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - There has been considerable controversy over unsolicited credit ratings in recent years. Some dissatisfied issuers allege that unsolicited ratings are biased downward in contrast to solicited ratings. This is the first empirical study to analyze the controversy using pooled time-series cross-sectional data of 265 firms in 15 countries from Standard and Poor's Ratings Services (SandP's) during the period of 1998-2000. The results demonstrate that unsolicited ratings are lower. On the other hand, I also find that those issuers who choose not to obtain rating services from SandP's have weaker financial profiles. Although the difference in ratings can be explained by this significant self-selection bias, results of the Japanese sub-sample indicate that unsolicited ratings are still lower than solicited ratings after controlling for differences in sovereign risk and key financial characteristics.

AB - There has been considerable controversy over unsolicited credit ratings in recent years. Some dissatisfied issuers allege that unsolicited ratings are biased downward in contrast to solicited ratings. This is the first empirical study to analyze the controversy using pooled time-series cross-sectional data of 265 firms in 15 countries from Standard and Poor's Ratings Services (SandP's) during the period of 1998-2000. The results demonstrate that unsolicited ratings are lower. On the other hand, I also find that those issuers who choose not to obtain rating services from SandP's have weaker financial profiles. Although the difference in ratings can be explained by this significant self-selection bias, results of the Japanese sub-sample indicate that unsolicited ratings are still lower than solicited ratings after controlling for differences in sovereign risk and key financial characteristics.

KW - Ordered-probit model

KW - Selectivity bias

KW - Standard and Poor's ratings

KW - Unsolicited credit ratings

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1965

U2 - 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00253-9

DO - 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00253-9

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 27

SP - 593

EP - 614

JO - Journal of Banking and Finance

JF - Journal of Banking and Finance

SN - 0378-4266

IS - 4

ER -