Abstract
An ever-dwindling carbon budget, resulting in temperature rise of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels projected between 2030-2035, has generated a necessity to explore climate mitigation technologies such as direct air capture (DAC). DAC typically involves the use of materials and energy to capture CO2 directly from the atmosphere. However, DAC technologies remain a long way from the necessary level of development and scale needed to move the needle on carbon removal and mitigating against climate change. This study conducts a country-level analysis using an expert elicitation and an information entropy method, with a weighted group of variables identified from existing literature as necessary to develop and deploy low-temperature, electrochemical and high-temperature DAC technologies. Here we show that: (1) adopting the expert survey variable weighting, USA, Canada, China and Australia are best positioned to deploy the various DAC technologies; (2) the information entropy approach offers a broadly similar result with traditionally developed nations being best positioned, in addition to land rich countries, to deploy DAC technologies; (3) a comparatively developed policy and financing environment, as well as low carbon energy supply would raise a country’s DAC capacity; (4) developing countries such as China have significant potential to deploy DAC, owing to a well-rounded position across variables. These results produce wide-ranging policy implications for efforts to deploy climate mitigation technologies through the development of a multilateral, coordinated mitigation and carbon dioxide removal deployment strategy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 045003 |
Journal | Environmental Research Communications |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 11 Apr 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Funding
The authors are grateful for the valuable comments and constructive suggestions offered by Dr Jessica Strefler from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), which helped improve this work. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Y W Z and B Z acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71803133) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Central Universities at Shanghai Jiao Tong University (No. WF220428008). D I and J L are employees of the direct air capture start-up Carbon Infinity and have an ownership stake in the form of shares.
Keywords
- carbon dioxide removal
- carbon dioxide removal policy
- climate change mitigation
- direct air capture
- environmental engineering