Assessing the response format effects on the scaling of marketing stimuli

Ling PENG, Adam FINN

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Multi-item rating scales are the accepted solution for achieving reliable and valid measures in the social sciences. Issues not fully resolved include the optimal number of response categories, choice of semantic rating versus Likert form, and the appropriateness of mixing positively and negatively expressed items. While there is considerable empirical research on these issues, it addresses the scaling of respondents and is yet to produce consensus as to the most appropriate practice. In marketing, multi-item scales are not only used to scale consumer respondents, they are used to scale marketing stimuli. This article examines these response format issues when the primary objective is to scale marketing stimuli rather than consumers using generalisability theory criteria for data quality. G-study website assessment data using different response formats are used to compare their effects on the observed variance components and G-coefficients for websites. Conclusions are drawn for the most appropriate response format to use in marketing studies that scale marketing stimuli.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-619
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Market Research
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Scaling
Marketing
Web sites
Rating
Coefficients
Data quality
Appropriateness
Social sciences
Empirical research
Variance components
Rating scales

Cite this

@article{6efdcfa2d34b4b80ab21a10c94893d04,
title = "Assessing the response format effects on the scaling of marketing stimuli",
abstract = "Multi-item rating scales are the accepted solution for achieving reliable and valid measures in the social sciences. Issues not fully resolved include the optimal number of response categories, choice of semantic rating versus Likert form, and the appropriateness of mixing positively and negatively expressed items. While there is considerable empirical research on these issues, it addresses the scaling of respondents and is yet to produce consensus as to the most appropriate practice. In marketing, multi-item scales are not only used to scale consumer respondents, they are used to scale marketing stimuli. This article examines these response format issues when the primary objective is to scale marketing stimuli rather than consumers using generalisability theory criteria for data quality. G-study website assessment data using different response formats are used to compare their effects on the observed variance components and G-coefficients for websites. Conclusions are drawn for the most appropriate response format to use in marketing studies that scale marketing stimuli.",
author = "Ling PENG and Adam FINN",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2501/IJMR-2015-052",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "595--619",
journal = "International Journal of Market Research",
issn = "1470-7853",
publisher = "Market Research Society",
number = "4",

}

Assessing the response format effects on the scaling of marketing stimuli. / PENG, Ling; FINN, Adam.

In: International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 58, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 595-619.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the response format effects on the scaling of marketing stimuli

AU - PENG, Ling

AU - FINN, Adam

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Multi-item rating scales are the accepted solution for achieving reliable and valid measures in the social sciences. Issues not fully resolved include the optimal number of response categories, choice of semantic rating versus Likert form, and the appropriateness of mixing positively and negatively expressed items. While there is considerable empirical research on these issues, it addresses the scaling of respondents and is yet to produce consensus as to the most appropriate practice. In marketing, multi-item scales are not only used to scale consumer respondents, they are used to scale marketing stimuli. This article examines these response format issues when the primary objective is to scale marketing stimuli rather than consumers using generalisability theory criteria for data quality. G-study website assessment data using different response formats are used to compare their effects on the observed variance components and G-coefficients for websites. Conclusions are drawn for the most appropriate response format to use in marketing studies that scale marketing stimuli.

AB - Multi-item rating scales are the accepted solution for achieving reliable and valid measures in the social sciences. Issues not fully resolved include the optimal number of response categories, choice of semantic rating versus Likert form, and the appropriateness of mixing positively and negatively expressed items. While there is considerable empirical research on these issues, it addresses the scaling of respondents and is yet to produce consensus as to the most appropriate practice. In marketing, multi-item scales are not only used to scale consumer respondents, they are used to scale marketing stimuli. This article examines these response format issues when the primary objective is to scale marketing stimuli rather than consumers using generalisability theory criteria for data quality. G-study website assessment data using different response formats are used to compare their effects on the observed variance components and G-coefficients for websites. Conclusions are drawn for the most appropriate response format to use in marketing studies that scale marketing stimuli.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5443

U2 - 10.2501/IJMR-2015-052

DO - 10.2501/IJMR-2015-052

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 58

SP - 595

EP - 619

JO - International Journal of Market Research

JF - International Journal of Market Research

SN - 1470-7853

IS - 4

ER -