Abstract
This study investigates attitudes toward income inequality in China, challenging the prevailing perception that Chinese citizens are tolerant of inequality. Using data from a large-scale cross-national survey encompassing 30 countries, the study examines the unique position of China, where citizens express one of the highest average concerns about income inequality. These concerns have not evolved alongside the marketization of the Chinese economy since the 1980s. Our analysis reveals that Chinese attitudes toward inequality are more similar to those in post-socialist countries than in liberal capitalist societies. However, Chinese citizens also prioritize a fair society with minimal differences and favor an active governmental role in redistribution, aligning their preferences with those found in welfare-oriented market societies. The study further explores sociodemographic predictors, finding that concern about inequality is particularly pronounced among males, highly educated, and older individuals, which may reflect system justification beliefs. Education is linked to stronger egalitarian preferences and support for government intervention, while age consistently exercises a positive effect on these attitudes, highlighting parallels with post-socialist rather than liberal capitalist or welfare states.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Contemporary China |
Early online date | 6 Jan 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 6 Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
We sincerely thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their invaluable comments and guidance through out the review process. We also extend our gratitude to Peng Wang and Minhui Liu for their insightful suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript. Any remaining errors or omissions are solely our responsibility.Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Concern about income inequality
- preference for redistribution
- China
- ISSP
- cross-country comparative analysis