TY - GEN
T1 - Attributes of dynamic combinatorial optimisation
AU - ROHLFSHAGEN, Philipp
AU - YAO, Xin
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The field of evolutionary computation has traditionally focused on static optimisation problems but recently, many new approaches have been proposed that adapt traditional evolutionary algorithms to deal with the task of tracking high-quality solutions as the search space changes over time. Algorithms developed specifically for dynamic domains have been tested on a wide range of different problems, including well-specified benchmark generators. However, the lack of theoretical results, a general omission of references to actual real-world scenarios, as well as a substantial emphasis on the continuous domain may divert attention away from some highly relevant issues. Here we review the state of the field and analyse dynamics in the combinatorial domain, using the subset sum problem as an example. It is shown that some of the assumptions underlying the development of new algorithms do not necessarily hold in the case of discrete optimisation. Furthermore, it is argued that more attention should be paid to the underlying dynamics and the impact of the representation used. © 2008 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
AB - The field of evolutionary computation has traditionally focused on static optimisation problems but recently, many new approaches have been proposed that adapt traditional evolutionary algorithms to deal with the task of tracking high-quality solutions as the search space changes over time. Algorithms developed specifically for dynamic domains have been tested on a wide range of different problems, including well-specified benchmark generators. However, the lack of theoretical results, a general omission of references to actual real-world scenarios, as well as a substantial emphasis on the continuous domain may divert attention away from some highly relevant issues. Here we review the state of the field and analyse dynamics in the combinatorial domain, using the subset sum problem as an example. It is shown that some of the assumptions underlying the development of new algorithms do not necessarily hold in the case of discrete optimisation. Furthermore, it is argued that more attention should be paid to the underlying dynamics and the impact of the representation used. © 2008 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58349086608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-540-89694-4_45
DO - 10.1007/978-3-540-89694-4_45
M3 - Conference paper (refereed)
SN - 9783540896937
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
SP - 442
EP - 451
BT - Simulated Evolution and Learning : 7th International Conference, SEAL 2008, Melbourne, Australia, December 7-10, 2008, Proceedings
A2 - LI, Xiaodong
A2 - KIRLEY, Michael
A2 - ZHANG, Mengjie
A2 - GREEN, David
A2 - CIESIELSKI, Vic
A2 - ABBASS, Hussein
A2 - MICHALEWICZ, Zbigniew
A2 - HENDTLASS, Tim
A2 - DEB, Kalyanmoy
A2 - TAN, Kay Chen
A2 - BRANKE, Jürgen
A2 - SHI, Yuhui
PB - Springer Berlin Heidelberg
T2 - 7th International Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning, SEAL 2008
Y2 - 7 December 2008 through 10 December 2008
ER -