TY - JOUR
T1 - Between religion and superstition : Buddhism and Daoism in Guangzhou, China, 1900-1937
AU - POON, Shuk Wah
PY - 2009/12/1
Y1 - 2009/12/1
N2 - This paper illustrates how Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with their legal religious status, situated themselves within the new concept of the modern nation-state, and how the distinction between religion and superstition affected ordinary people's religious lives. There were inherent tensions between religion and the modern nation-state, and the survival of Buddhism and Daoism was determined by their subordination to the state ideology and to political authorities’ regulation. However, the government did not regulate the form of worship in government-approved religious sites. Due to the syncretic nature of Chinese religion, the select few of the Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with government recognition as symbols of “true religions,” paradoxically served as a protective umbrella for the people to carry on with their “superstitious” practices. At the level of praxis, the line between religion and superstition was not as distinguishable as the government had envisioned.
AB - This paper illustrates how Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with their legal religious status, situated themselves within the new concept of the modern nation-state, and how the distinction between religion and superstition affected ordinary people's religious lives. There were inherent tensions between religion and the modern nation-state, and the survival of Buddhism and Daoism was determined by their subordination to the state ideology and to political authorities’ regulation. However, the government did not regulate the form of worship in government-approved religious sites. Due to the syncretic nature of Chinese religion, the select few of the Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with government recognition as symbols of “true religions,” paradoxically served as a protective umbrella for the people to carry on with their “superstitious” practices. At the level of praxis, the line between religion and superstition was not as distinguishable as the government had envisioned.
UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/556
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73849122696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2009.00825.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2009.00825.x
M3 - Journal Article (refereed)
SN - 0022-4227
VL - 33
SP - 452
EP - 471
JO - Journal of Religious History
JF - Journal of Religious History
IS - 4
ER -