Between religion and superstition : Buddhism and Daoism in Guangzhou, China, 1900-1937

Shuk Wah POON

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

This paper illustrates how Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with their legal religious status, situated themselves within the new concept of the modern nation-state, and how the distinction between religion and superstition affected ordinary people's religious lives. There were inherent tensions between religion and the modern nation-state, and the survival of Buddhism and Daoism was determined by their subordination to the state ideology and to political authorities’ regulation. However, the government did not regulate the form of worship in government-approved religious sites. Due to the syncretic nature of Chinese religion, the select few of the Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with government recognition as symbols of “true religions,” paradoxically served as a protective umbrella for the people to carry on with their “superstitious” practices. At the level of praxis, the line between religion and superstition was not as distinguishable as the government had envisioned.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-471
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Religious History
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Religion
Taoism
China
Superstition
Buddhism
Government
Daoist
Nation-state
Buddhist
Monastery
Political Authority
Subordination
Religious Life
Symbol
Ideology
Praxis
Worship

Cite this

@article{ff9bfad967444810be5711dcc586318b,
title = "Between religion and superstition : Buddhism and Daoism in Guangzhou, China, 1900-1937",
abstract = "This paper illustrates how Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with their legal religious status, situated themselves within the new concept of the modern nation-state, and how the distinction between religion and superstition affected ordinary people's religious lives. There were inherent tensions between religion and the modern nation-state, and the survival of Buddhism and Daoism was determined by their subordination to the state ideology and to political authorities’ regulation. However, the government did not regulate the form of worship in government-approved religious sites. Due to the syncretic nature of Chinese religion, the select few of the Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with government recognition as symbols of “true religions,” paradoxically served as a protective umbrella for the people to carry on with their “superstitious” practices. At the level of praxis, the line between religion and superstition was not as distinguishable as the government had envisioned.",
author = "POON, {Shuk Wah}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9809.2009.00825.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "452--471",
journal = "Journal of Religious History",
issn = "0022-4227",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Between religion and superstition : Buddhism and Daoism in Guangzhou, China, 1900-1937. / POON, Shuk Wah.

In: Journal of Religious History, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.12.2009, p. 452-471.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between religion and superstition : Buddhism and Daoism in Guangzhou, China, 1900-1937

AU - POON, Shuk Wah

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - This paper illustrates how Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with their legal religious status, situated themselves within the new concept of the modern nation-state, and how the distinction between religion and superstition affected ordinary people's religious lives. There were inherent tensions between religion and the modern nation-state, and the survival of Buddhism and Daoism was determined by their subordination to the state ideology and to political authorities’ regulation. However, the government did not regulate the form of worship in government-approved religious sites. Due to the syncretic nature of Chinese religion, the select few of the Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with government recognition as symbols of “true religions,” paradoxically served as a protective umbrella for the people to carry on with their “superstitious” practices. At the level of praxis, the line between religion and superstition was not as distinguishable as the government had envisioned.

AB - This paper illustrates how Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with their legal religious status, situated themselves within the new concept of the modern nation-state, and how the distinction between religion and superstition affected ordinary people's religious lives. There were inherent tensions between religion and the modern nation-state, and the survival of Buddhism and Daoism was determined by their subordination to the state ideology and to political authorities’ regulation. However, the government did not regulate the form of worship in government-approved religious sites. Due to the syncretic nature of Chinese religion, the select few of the Buddhist and Daoist monasteries in Guangzhou, with government recognition as symbols of “true religions,” paradoxically served as a protective umbrella for the people to carry on with their “superstitious” practices. At the level of praxis, the line between religion and superstition was not as distinguishable as the government had envisioned.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/556

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2009.00825.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2009.00825.x

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 33

SP - 452

EP - 471

JO - Journal of Religious History

JF - Journal of Religious History

SN - 0022-4227

IS - 4

ER -