Beyond the Limits of the Productivist Regime : Capturing Three Decades of East Asian Welfare Development with Fuzzy Sets

Nan YANG, Stefan KÜHNER

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

Systematic accounts of East Asian government responses to the 'limits of productivist regimes' (Gough, 2004) remain surprisingly rare. This article develops three distinct types of East Asian welfare development, i.e. quantitative, type-specific, and radical, employing set-theoretic methods. It then uses these types to analyse six policy fields, including education, health care, family policy, old-age pensions, public housing, and passive labour market policy, in six East Asian societies: China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. We find that all cases except Hong Kong and Singapore have experienced at least one radical shift in their welfare models over the past three decades (1990-2016). East Asian governments have increasingly combined quantitative expansion or retrenchment of 'productive' and 'protective' policy structures but have done so in unique ways. South Korea has followed the most 'balanced' approach to welfare development and stands out as the best candidate for further type-specific expansions moving forward.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Policy and Society
Early online date20 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

welfare
regime
Singapore
Hong Kong
family policy
public housing
pension
South Korea
Korea
Taiwan
candidacy
Japan
health care
China
society
education
Labor Market Policy

Bibliographical note

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474641900054X.

Keywords

  • East Asian welfare models
  • fuzzy set analysis
  • Productivist welfare capitalism
  • set-theoretic methods
  • social investment

Cite this

@article{e2a4831242d34769adc6f93809df0b3e,
title = "Beyond the Limits of the Productivist Regime : Capturing Three Decades of East Asian Welfare Development with Fuzzy Sets",
abstract = "Systematic accounts of East Asian government responses to the 'limits of productivist regimes' (Gough, 2004) remain surprisingly rare. This article develops three distinct types of East Asian welfare development, i.e. quantitative, type-specific, and radical, employing set-theoretic methods. It then uses these types to analyse six policy fields, including education, health care, family policy, old-age pensions, public housing, and passive labour market policy, in six East Asian societies: China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. We find that all cases except Hong Kong and Singapore have experienced at least one radical shift in their welfare models over the past three decades (1990-2016). East Asian governments have increasingly combined quantitative expansion or retrenchment of 'productive' and 'protective' policy structures but have done so in unique ways. South Korea has followed the most 'balanced' approach to welfare development and stands out as the best candidate for further type-specific expansions moving forward.",
keywords = "East Asian welfare models, fuzzy set analysis, Productivist welfare capitalism, set-theoretic methods, social investment",
author = "Nan YANG and Stefan K{\"U}HNER",
note = "To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474641900054X.",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1017/S147474641900054X",
language = "English",
journal = "Social Policy and Society",
issn = "1474-7464",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the Limits of the Productivist Regime : Capturing Three Decades of East Asian Welfare Development with Fuzzy Sets

AU - YANG, Nan

AU - KÜHNER, Stefan

N1 - To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474641900054X.

PY - 2020/1/20

Y1 - 2020/1/20

N2 - Systematic accounts of East Asian government responses to the 'limits of productivist regimes' (Gough, 2004) remain surprisingly rare. This article develops three distinct types of East Asian welfare development, i.e. quantitative, type-specific, and radical, employing set-theoretic methods. It then uses these types to analyse six policy fields, including education, health care, family policy, old-age pensions, public housing, and passive labour market policy, in six East Asian societies: China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. We find that all cases except Hong Kong and Singapore have experienced at least one radical shift in their welfare models over the past three decades (1990-2016). East Asian governments have increasingly combined quantitative expansion or retrenchment of 'productive' and 'protective' policy structures but have done so in unique ways. South Korea has followed the most 'balanced' approach to welfare development and stands out as the best candidate for further type-specific expansions moving forward.

AB - Systematic accounts of East Asian government responses to the 'limits of productivist regimes' (Gough, 2004) remain surprisingly rare. This article develops three distinct types of East Asian welfare development, i.e. quantitative, type-specific, and radical, employing set-theoretic methods. It then uses these types to analyse six policy fields, including education, health care, family policy, old-age pensions, public housing, and passive labour market policy, in six East Asian societies: China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. We find that all cases except Hong Kong and Singapore have experienced at least one radical shift in their welfare models over the past three decades (1990-2016). East Asian governments have increasingly combined quantitative expansion or retrenchment of 'productive' and 'protective' policy structures but have done so in unique ways. South Korea has followed the most 'balanced' approach to welfare development and stands out as the best candidate for further type-specific expansions moving forward.

KW - East Asian welfare models

KW - fuzzy set analysis

KW - Productivist welfare capitalism

KW - set-theoretic methods

KW - social investment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078542021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S147474641900054X

DO - 10.1017/S147474641900054X

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

AN - SCOPUS:85078542021

JO - Social Policy and Society

JF - Social Policy and Society

SN - 1474-7464

ER -