Abstract
Background
Diagnostic accuracy is an unmet need for major depressive disorder (MDD) and major depressive episode (MDE) in bipolar disorder. Very limited research has evaluated bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) time-series data.
Aims
We aimed to examine differentiating phenomenological characteristics in positive affect dynamics, and temporal relationships with pleasure towards current activity and meaning in life (MIL), among MDD, MDE/bipolar disorder and healthy controls using EMA.
Method
Participants (N = 88, mean age 28.7 years, 69% female), including individuals with MDD (n = 29) and MDE/bipolar disorder (n = 29) and healthy controls (n = 30), were assessed for positive affect, pleasure and MIL 5 times daily over a 2-week period. Multilevel modelling analysis was conducted, with estimation of first-order autoregressive model structure and time-lagged relationship between pleasure and positive affect.
Results
From 4632 EMA observations, positive affect dynamics (inertia, variability and instability) did not differ significantly across groups (all P > 0.05). Although all groups demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between positive affect and pleasure, for MDE/bipolar disorder, both pleasuret − 1 (β = −0.11, t[51.09] = −2.31, P = 0.025) and positive affectt − 1 (β = −0.13, t[56.54] = −2.30, P = 0.025) predicted subsequent MIL less significantly than for MDD and healthy controls.
Conclusion
Individuals with MDE/bipolar disorder, but not MDD, had less self-reported MIL from positive affect and pleasure. There is little evidence that emotional experience alone characterises the pathophysiology between MDD and MDE/bipolar disorder; such investigation may be limited by within-group heterogeneity. Our findings provide a new perspective on using a time-series approach beyond bimodal measures in EMA to differentiate bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD.
Diagnostic accuracy is an unmet need for major depressive disorder (MDD) and major depressive episode (MDE) in bipolar disorder. Very limited research has evaluated bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) time-series data.
Aims
We aimed to examine differentiating phenomenological characteristics in positive affect dynamics, and temporal relationships with pleasure towards current activity and meaning in life (MIL), among MDD, MDE/bipolar disorder and healthy controls using EMA.
Method
Participants (N = 88, mean age 28.7 years, 69% female), including individuals with MDD (n = 29) and MDE/bipolar disorder (n = 29) and healthy controls (n = 30), were assessed for positive affect, pleasure and MIL 5 times daily over a 2-week period. Multilevel modelling analysis was conducted, with estimation of first-order autoregressive model structure and time-lagged relationship between pleasure and positive affect.
Results
From 4632 EMA observations, positive affect dynamics (inertia, variability and instability) did not differ significantly across groups (all P > 0.05). Although all groups demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between positive affect and pleasure, for MDE/bipolar disorder, both pleasuret − 1 (β = −0.11, t[51.09] = −2.31, P = 0.025) and positive affectt − 1 (β = −0.13, t[56.54] = −2.30, P = 0.025) predicted subsequent MIL less significantly than for MDD and healthy controls.
Conclusion
Individuals with MDE/bipolar disorder, but not MDD, had less self-reported MIL from positive affect and pleasure. There is little evidence that emotional experience alone characterises the pathophysiology between MDD and MDE/bipolar disorder; such investigation may be limited by within-group heterogeneity. Our findings provide a new perspective on using a time-series approach beyond bimodal measures in EMA to differentiate bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e141 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | BJPsych Open |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 7 Jul 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Funding
The study was supported by the Seed Fund for Basic Research of the University of Hong Kong (grant no. 2201101137).
Keywords
- Experience sampling method (ESM)
- ecological momentary assessment (EMA)
- depression
- bipolar disorder
- anhedonia