Bolzano on beauty

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper sets forth Bolzano’s little-known 1843 account of beauty. Bolzano accepted the thesis that beauty is what rewards contemplation with pleasure. The originality of his proposal lies in his claim that the source of this pleasure is a special kind of cognitive process, namely, the formation of an adequate concept of the object’s attributes through the successful exercise of the observer’s proficiency at obscure and confused cognition. To appreciate this proposal we must understand how Bolzano explicated a number of concepts (especially clarity, confusion, and intuition) in his Wissenschaftslehre. I argue that Bolzano was ahead of his time and anticipated some of the results of recent empirical psychological research on the relations between beauty, affect, and processing fluency. Bolzano’s remarks on ugliness and on relations between pure and mixed beauty are also of contemporary interest. The upshot is that Bolzano’s account of beauty is neither as derivative nor ‘dark’ as some of his commentators have claimed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-284
Number of pages16
JournalBritish Journal of Aesthetics
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Observer
Ugliness
Contemplation
Cognitive Processes
Exercise
Commentators
Fluency
Reward
Derivatives
Intuition
Psychological Research
Cognition
Originality
Clarity
Proficiency
Confusion

Bibliographical note

publication date: July 2014

Cite this

LIVINGSTON, Paisley. / Bolzano on beauty. In: British Journal of Aesthetics. 2014 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 269-284.
@article{fc75c199e34e4a2493e4d7f8ec6395d1,
title = "Bolzano on beauty",
abstract = "This paper sets forth Bolzano’s little-known 1843 account of beauty. Bolzano accepted the thesis that beauty is what rewards contemplation with pleasure. The originality of his proposal lies in his claim that the source of this pleasure is a special kind of cognitive process, namely, the formation of an adequate concept of the object’s attributes through the successful exercise of the observer’s proficiency at obscure and confused cognition. To appreciate this proposal we must understand how Bolzano explicated a number of concepts (especially clarity, confusion, and intuition) in his Wissenschaftslehre. I argue that Bolzano was ahead of his time and anticipated some of the results of recent empirical psychological research on the relations between beauty, affect, and processing fluency. Bolzano’s remarks on ugliness and on relations between pure and mixed beauty are also of contemporary interest. The upshot is that Bolzano’s account of beauty is neither as derivative nor ‘dark’ as some of his commentators have claimed.",
author = "Paisley LIVINGSTON",
note = "publication date: July 2014",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aesthj/ayu037",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "269--284",
journal = "British Journal of Aesthetics",
issn = "0007-0904",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Bolzano on beauty. / LIVINGSTON, Paisley.

In: British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 269-284.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bolzano on beauty

AU - LIVINGSTON, Paisley

N1 - publication date: July 2014

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This paper sets forth Bolzano’s little-known 1843 account of beauty. Bolzano accepted the thesis that beauty is what rewards contemplation with pleasure. The originality of his proposal lies in his claim that the source of this pleasure is a special kind of cognitive process, namely, the formation of an adequate concept of the object’s attributes through the successful exercise of the observer’s proficiency at obscure and confused cognition. To appreciate this proposal we must understand how Bolzano explicated a number of concepts (especially clarity, confusion, and intuition) in his Wissenschaftslehre. I argue that Bolzano was ahead of his time and anticipated some of the results of recent empirical psychological research on the relations between beauty, affect, and processing fluency. Bolzano’s remarks on ugliness and on relations between pure and mixed beauty are also of contemporary interest. The upshot is that Bolzano’s account of beauty is neither as derivative nor ‘dark’ as some of his commentators have claimed.

AB - This paper sets forth Bolzano’s little-known 1843 account of beauty. Bolzano accepted the thesis that beauty is what rewards contemplation with pleasure. The originality of his proposal lies in his claim that the source of this pleasure is a special kind of cognitive process, namely, the formation of an adequate concept of the object’s attributes through the successful exercise of the observer’s proficiency at obscure and confused cognition. To appreciate this proposal we must understand how Bolzano explicated a number of concepts (especially clarity, confusion, and intuition) in his Wissenschaftslehre. I argue that Bolzano was ahead of his time and anticipated some of the results of recent empirical psychological research on the relations between beauty, affect, and processing fluency. Bolzano’s remarks on ugliness and on relations between pure and mixed beauty are also of contemporary interest. The upshot is that Bolzano’s account of beauty is neither as derivative nor ‘dark’ as some of his commentators have claimed.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1582

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84913612912&doi=10.1093%2faesthj%2fayu037&partnerID=40&md5=5490e01e577adff69200efb60f52863b

U2 - 10.1093/aesthj/ayu037

DO - 10.1093/aesthj/ayu037

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 54

SP - 269

EP - 284

JO - British Journal of Aesthetics

JF - British Journal of Aesthetics

SN - 0007-0904

IS - 3

ER -