Can Chinese discuss conflicts openly? Field and experimental studies of face dynamics in China

Dean William TJOSVOLD, Chun HUI, Haifa SUN

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chinese people have been theorized to be particularly sensitive to social face and avoid direct discussion in conflict to promote interpersonal harmony. Social face has been used to explain the proclivity of East Asians to smooth over conflict. More research is needed to study social face empirically and its relationship with direct discussion and the processes by which social face has its impact. Results from a field interview study and an experiment conducted in China support theorizing that confirmation of face induces cooperative goals and open-mindedness. In contrast with common assumptions about Chinese organizations, direct discussion, compared to avoiding, strengthened relationships. Direct controversy, especially when face was confirmed, induced open-mindedness: Participants asked more questions, explored the opposing views, demonstrated more knowledge of the opposing arguments, and worked to integrate views. These results were interpreted as suggesting that Chinese people can discuss their conflicts directly and cooperatively when they are assured that their face is confirmed. Results have implications both for the general theory of cooperation and competition as well as our understanding of social face in China.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)351-373
Number of pages23
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2004

Fingerprint

China
Experiments
social studies
experiment
interview
Experimental study
Field study
Experimental Study
Open-mindedness

Cite this

@article{88f0e4c2904d4a81a94d9cfbb7aba869,
title = "Can Chinese discuss conflicts openly? Field and experimental studies of face dynamics in China",
abstract = "Chinese people have been theorized to be particularly sensitive to social face and avoid direct discussion in conflict to promote interpersonal harmony. Social face has been used to explain the proclivity of East Asians to smooth over conflict. More research is needed to study social face empirically and its relationship with direct discussion and the processes by which social face has its impact. Results from a field interview study and an experiment conducted in China support theorizing that confirmation of face induces cooperative goals and open-mindedness. In contrast with common assumptions about Chinese organizations, direct discussion, compared to avoiding, strengthened relationships. Direct controversy, especially when face was confirmed, induced open-mindedness: Participants asked more questions, explored the opposing views, demonstrated more knowledge of the opposing arguments, and worked to integrate views. These results were interpreted as suggesting that Chinese people can discuss their conflicts directly and cooperatively when they are assured that their face is confirmed. Results have implications both for the general theory of cooperation and competition as well as our understanding of social face in China.",
author = "TJOSVOLD, {Dean William} and Chun HUI and Haifa SUN",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/B:GRUP.0000042892.76805.83",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "351--373",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Can Chinese discuss conflicts openly? Field and experimental studies of face dynamics in China. / TJOSVOLD, Dean William; HUI, Chun; SUN, Haifa.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.07.2004, p. 351-373.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Chinese discuss conflicts openly? Field and experimental studies of face dynamics in China

AU - TJOSVOLD, Dean William

AU - HUI, Chun

AU - SUN, Haifa

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

N2 - Chinese people have been theorized to be particularly sensitive to social face and avoid direct discussion in conflict to promote interpersonal harmony. Social face has been used to explain the proclivity of East Asians to smooth over conflict. More research is needed to study social face empirically and its relationship with direct discussion and the processes by which social face has its impact. Results from a field interview study and an experiment conducted in China support theorizing that confirmation of face induces cooperative goals and open-mindedness. In contrast with common assumptions about Chinese organizations, direct discussion, compared to avoiding, strengthened relationships. Direct controversy, especially when face was confirmed, induced open-mindedness: Participants asked more questions, explored the opposing views, demonstrated more knowledge of the opposing arguments, and worked to integrate views. These results were interpreted as suggesting that Chinese people can discuss their conflicts directly and cooperatively when they are assured that their face is confirmed. Results have implications both for the general theory of cooperation and competition as well as our understanding of social face in China.

AB - Chinese people have been theorized to be particularly sensitive to social face and avoid direct discussion in conflict to promote interpersonal harmony. Social face has been used to explain the proclivity of East Asians to smooth over conflict. More research is needed to study social face empirically and its relationship with direct discussion and the processes by which social face has its impact. Results from a field interview study and an experiment conducted in China support theorizing that confirmation of face induces cooperative goals and open-mindedness. In contrast with common assumptions about Chinese organizations, direct discussion, compared to avoiding, strengthened relationships. Direct controversy, especially when face was confirmed, induced open-mindedness: Participants asked more questions, explored the opposing views, demonstrated more knowledge of the opposing arguments, and worked to integrate views. These results were interpreted as suggesting that Chinese people can discuss their conflicts directly and cooperatively when they are assured that their face is confirmed. Results have implications both for the general theory of cooperation and competition as well as our understanding of social face in China.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2021

U2 - 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000042892.76805.83

DO - 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000042892.76805.83

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 13

SP - 351

EP - 373

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

IS - 4

ER -