Centralization and decentralization : changing governance in education

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Globalization and the evolution of a knowledge-based economy have caused dramatic changes to the character and functions of education in most countries around the world. However, the impacts of globalization on schools and universities are not uniform though business-like practices have been adopted to cope with competition in the global marketplace. In the face of financial constraints and weakened state capacity in social policy provision, the pressure for restructuring and reforming education is increasingly driven by the growing expectations and demands of different stakeholders in society. In recent years, widespread concerns over widened access, funding, accountability, quality, and managerial efficiency are perceived as the prominent global trends related to education. Because of the divergent political, social, economic, cultural and historical backgrounds, national/local governments may adopt similar or different strategies in response to pressures generated by globalization. One popular public policy strategy commonly adopted by modern states is decentralization even though there is no consensus on whether a policy of centralization or decentralization is more effective to improve the organization and management of the public sector. This special issue, set in this policy context, examines the way the policy of decentralization has affected the running of education in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Shanghai and Singapore, with particular reference to strategies adopted in reforming the structure, mobilizing different societal forces to create more educational opportunities and devising new measures and mechanisms to assure quality in the education sector. One very significant consequence of the change in the role of the state in education is that the public-good functions of education, of which the state has taken the primary role of a reliable guarantor, have diminished. Nonetheless, the state’s role as a regulator and overall service coordinator has been strengthened rather than weakened under the policy of decentralization. Contributors in this issue not only examine recent educational developments in selected Chinese societies but also analyze such developments in the light of the global trend of decentralization in educational governance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-16
Number of pages14
JournalEducation and Society
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

centralization
decentralization
governance
education
globalization
educational opportunity
trend
social economics
Singapore
Hong Kong
Taiwan
restructuring
public sector
public policy
funding
stakeholder
organization
efficiency
responsibility
economy

Cite this

@article{1a063a7e818b44fa8aa86596e5dc4eae,
title = "Centralization and decentralization : changing governance in education",
abstract = "Globalization and the evolution of a knowledge-based economy have caused dramatic changes to the character and functions of education in most countries around the world. However, the impacts of globalization on schools and universities are not uniform though business-like practices have been adopted to cope with competition in the global marketplace. In the face of financial constraints and weakened state capacity in social policy provision, the pressure for restructuring and reforming education is increasingly driven by the growing expectations and demands of different stakeholders in society. In recent years, widespread concerns over widened access, funding, accountability, quality, and managerial efficiency are perceived as the prominent global trends related to education. Because of the divergent political, social, economic, cultural and historical backgrounds, national/local governments may adopt similar or different strategies in response to pressures generated by globalization. One popular public policy strategy commonly adopted by modern states is decentralization even though there is no consensus on whether a policy of centralization or decentralization is more effective to improve the organization and management of the public sector. This special issue, set in this policy context, examines the way the policy of decentralization has affected the running of education in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Shanghai and Singapore, with particular reference to strategies adopted in reforming the structure, mobilizing different societal forces to create more educational opportunities and devising new measures and mechanisms to assure quality in the education sector. One very significant consequence of the change in the role of the state in education is that the public-good functions of education, of which the state has taken the primary role of a reliable guarantor, have diminished. Nonetheless, the state’s role as a regulator and overall service coordinator has been strengthened rather than weakened under the policy of decentralization. Contributors in this issue not only examine recent educational developments in selected Chinese societies but also analyze such developments in the light of the global trend of decentralization in educational governance.",
author = "MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7459/es/19.3.01",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "3--16",
journal = "Education and Society",
issn = "0726-2655",
number = "3",

}

Centralization and decentralization : changing governance in education. / MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua.

In: Education and Society, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 3-16.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Centralization and decentralization : changing governance in education

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Globalization and the evolution of a knowledge-based economy have caused dramatic changes to the character and functions of education in most countries around the world. However, the impacts of globalization on schools and universities are not uniform though business-like practices have been adopted to cope with competition in the global marketplace. In the face of financial constraints and weakened state capacity in social policy provision, the pressure for restructuring and reforming education is increasingly driven by the growing expectations and demands of different stakeholders in society. In recent years, widespread concerns over widened access, funding, accountability, quality, and managerial efficiency are perceived as the prominent global trends related to education. Because of the divergent political, social, economic, cultural and historical backgrounds, national/local governments may adopt similar or different strategies in response to pressures generated by globalization. One popular public policy strategy commonly adopted by modern states is decentralization even though there is no consensus on whether a policy of centralization or decentralization is more effective to improve the organization and management of the public sector. This special issue, set in this policy context, examines the way the policy of decentralization has affected the running of education in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Shanghai and Singapore, with particular reference to strategies adopted in reforming the structure, mobilizing different societal forces to create more educational opportunities and devising new measures and mechanisms to assure quality in the education sector. One very significant consequence of the change in the role of the state in education is that the public-good functions of education, of which the state has taken the primary role of a reliable guarantor, have diminished. Nonetheless, the state’s role as a regulator and overall service coordinator has been strengthened rather than weakened under the policy of decentralization. Contributors in this issue not only examine recent educational developments in selected Chinese societies but also analyze such developments in the light of the global trend of decentralization in educational governance.

AB - Globalization and the evolution of a knowledge-based economy have caused dramatic changes to the character and functions of education in most countries around the world. However, the impacts of globalization on schools and universities are not uniform though business-like practices have been adopted to cope with competition in the global marketplace. In the face of financial constraints and weakened state capacity in social policy provision, the pressure for restructuring and reforming education is increasingly driven by the growing expectations and demands of different stakeholders in society. In recent years, widespread concerns over widened access, funding, accountability, quality, and managerial efficiency are perceived as the prominent global trends related to education. Because of the divergent political, social, economic, cultural and historical backgrounds, national/local governments may adopt similar or different strategies in response to pressures generated by globalization. One popular public policy strategy commonly adopted by modern states is decentralization even though there is no consensus on whether a policy of centralization or decentralization is more effective to improve the organization and management of the public sector. This special issue, set in this policy context, examines the way the policy of decentralization has affected the running of education in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Shanghai and Singapore, with particular reference to strategies adopted in reforming the structure, mobilizing different societal forces to create more educational opportunities and devising new measures and mechanisms to assure quality in the education sector. One very significant consequence of the change in the role of the state in education is that the public-good functions of education, of which the state has taken the primary role of a reliable guarantor, have diminished. Nonetheless, the state’s role as a regulator and overall service coordinator has been strengthened rather than weakened under the policy of decentralization. Contributors in this issue not only examine recent educational developments in selected Chinese societies but also analyze such developments in the light of the global trend of decentralization in educational governance.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1398

U2 - 10.7459/es/19.3.01

DO - 10.7459/es/19.3.01

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 19

SP - 3

EP - 16

JO - Education and Society

JF - Education and Society

SN - 0726-2655

IS - 3

ER -