China experience, comparative advantage, and the rural reconstruction experiment

Tiejun WEN, Xiaodan DONG, Shuai YANG, Jiansheng QIU, Kin Chi LAU

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review


Since China's accession to the WTO in 2001, "China experience" in the Western theoretical discourse could be extracted into two points. First, China's high growth rate, lasting over thirty years, has benefited from institutional change in globalisation that are implicated with Western ideology. Second, China's comparative advantage in attracting foreign investment can be mainly attributed to its rich labor resource. Clearly, these two assertions are shaping the world's understanding of China in an increasingly profound manner. Nevertheless, the assertions above contradict a rarely raised bit of common sense: Most of the developing countries have adopted even more westernized institutional reforms than China did, and all large developing nations have the so-called "comparative advantage" of rich labor resources (e.g., in Asia, there are five developing nations with populations over 100 million). But why did economic phenomena similar to China not take place in those nations? Apparently, the Western mainstream theories cannot explain China's economic growth. In other words, what China possesses is not the experience and comparative advantage in the Western sense.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal capitalism and the future of agrarian society
PublisherParadigm Publishers
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9781612050379
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012

Bibliographical note

The first draft in Chinese was published in Open Times, February 2008. This version is revised in March 2009.


Dive into the research topics of 'China experience, comparative advantage, and the rural reconstruction experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this