Chinese rhetoric : Modality patterns and the question of indirection in written arguments

Lorrita YEUNG

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

This study investigates the question of Chinese indirection as a result of the use of modality expressions, which is conventionally believed to be the hallmark of Chinese rhetoric (e.g. Young, 1994; Bond, 1991; Powers and Gong, 1994). The present research compares and contrasts the degree of assertiveness as reflected in the patterns of modality in two corpora of expert Chinese and English argumentative writing on the same controversial subject. Corpus evidence shows that contrary to expectations, the Chinese writers are significantly more assertive than the English in arguing their case. The frequency of use and distribution patterns of intensifiers present both quantitative and qualitative evidence for the rhetorical differences, which may be accounted for culturally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-161
JournalLanguages in Contrast
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date19 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

    Fingerprint

Cite this