Citizens v. Government : litigation outcomes before the Hong Kong court of final appeal

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Based on reviewing all the judgments on substantive appeals issued by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (HKCFA) between July 1997 and 2015, this research note studies how the Hong Kong government and individual litigants fared before the final appellate court. It is found that the overall success rate of the Hong Kong government before the HKCFA was 46 percent and that of individual litigants was 54 percent. There were, however, substantial variations in the litigation outcomes in different categories of cases. While the government achieved a remarkable record in administrative decision litigation, it fared poorly in criminal appeals. The research note also discusses two important insights from the litigation outcomes before the HKCFA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-180
Number of pages14
JournalChina Review
Volume17
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
appeal
citizen
appellate court

Cite this

@article{30d690e583584f89acb8f49f7c07d273,
title = "Citizens v. Government : litigation outcomes before the Hong Kong court of final appeal",
abstract = "Based on reviewing all the judgments on substantive appeals issued by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (HKCFA) between July 1997 and 2015, this research note studies how the Hong Kong government and individual litigants fared before the final appellate court. It is found that the overall success rate of the Hong Kong government before the HKCFA was 46 percent and that of individual litigants was 54 percent. There were, however, substantial variations in the litigation outcomes in different categories of cases. While the government achieved a remarkable record in administrative decision litigation, it fared poorly in criminal appeals. The research note also discusses two important insights from the litigation outcomes before the HKCFA.",
author = "TAM, {Wai Keung}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "167--180",
journal = "China Review",
issn = "1680-2012",
publisher = "The Chinese University Press",
number = "3",

}

Citizens v. Government : litigation outcomes before the Hong Kong court of final appeal. / TAM, Wai Keung.

In: China Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, 10.2017, p. 167-180.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Citizens v. Government : litigation outcomes before the Hong Kong court of final appeal

AU - TAM, Wai Keung

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Based on reviewing all the judgments on substantive appeals issued by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (HKCFA) between July 1997 and 2015, this research note studies how the Hong Kong government and individual litigants fared before the final appellate court. It is found that the overall success rate of the Hong Kong government before the HKCFA was 46 percent and that of individual litigants was 54 percent. There were, however, substantial variations in the litigation outcomes in different categories of cases. While the government achieved a remarkable record in administrative decision litigation, it fared poorly in criminal appeals. The research note also discusses two important insights from the litigation outcomes before the HKCFA.

AB - Based on reviewing all the judgments on substantive appeals issued by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (HKCFA) between July 1997 and 2015, this research note studies how the Hong Kong government and individual litigants fared before the final appellate court. It is found that the overall success rate of the Hong Kong government before the HKCFA was 46 percent and that of individual litigants was 54 percent. There were, however, substantial variations in the litigation outcomes in different categories of cases. While the government achieved a remarkable record in administrative decision litigation, it fared poorly in criminal appeals. The research note also discusses two important insights from the litigation outcomes before the HKCFA.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6689

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 17

SP - 167

EP - 180

JO - China Review

JF - China Review

SN - 1680-2012

IS - 3

ER -