Collective action on climate change : the logic of regime failure

Paul G. HARRIS

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The international climate regime, primarily designed to limit the emissions of pollutants causing global warming, has failed. Why has international cooperation to combat global warming been so difficult, and what factors must change to improve the situation - assuming it is even possible? Using Mancur Olson's classical theory of collective action, this article endeavors to explain the failure of the climate regime. Other international environmental agreements and the associated regimes, such as the Mediterranean Action Plan and the Montreal Protocol on ozone depletion, demonstrate that collective action to address international environmental problems is possible. Both agreements contain the ingredients that classical theory suggests are necessary to achieve collective action. But the flipside of collective action theory - that collective action in larger groups is very difficult or unlikely - can also apply to international agreements and action on climate change. Despite the Mediterranean and Montreal successes, relatively speaking, and in spite of so much effort over two decades to create an effective climate regime, it is by no means apparent that the elements for success will exist for the foreseeable future. We should expect a continued muddling along that may, at best, reduce slightly - but not reverse - global warming at some point in the relatively distant future. Climate change is with us to stay.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-224
Number of pages30
JournalNatural Resources Journal
Volume47
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Fingerprint

collective action
collective behavior
climate change
regime
global warming
climate
Montreal Protocol
action theory
international agreement
ozone depletion
international cooperation
action plan
pollutant
environmental impact
speaking
Group

Cite this

HARRIS, Paul G. / Collective action on climate change : the logic of regime failure. In: Natural Resources Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 195-224.
@article{3cb59712020646cbaaab8d8af032b7dd,
title = "Collective action on climate change : the logic of regime failure",
abstract = "The international climate regime, primarily designed to limit the emissions of pollutants causing global warming, has failed. Why has international cooperation to combat global warming been so difficult, and what factors must change to improve the situation - assuming it is even possible? Using Mancur Olson's classical theory of collective action, this article endeavors to explain the failure of the climate regime. Other international environmental agreements and the associated regimes, such as the Mediterranean Action Plan and the Montreal Protocol on ozone depletion, demonstrate that collective action to address international environmental problems is possible. Both agreements contain the ingredients that classical theory suggests are necessary to achieve collective action. But the flipside of collective action theory - that collective action in larger groups is very difficult or unlikely - can also apply to international agreements and action on climate change. Despite the Mediterranean and Montreal successes, relatively speaking, and in spite of so much effort over two decades to create an effective climate regime, it is by no means apparent that the elements for success will exist for the foreseeable future. We should expect a continued muddling along that may, at best, reduce slightly - but not reverse - global warming at some point in the relatively distant future. Climate change is with us to stay.",
author = "HARRIS, {Paul G.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "195--224",
journal = "Natural Resources Journal",
issn = "0028-0739",
publisher = "University of New Mexico",
number = "1",

}

Collective action on climate change : the logic of regime failure. / HARRIS, Paul G.

In: Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 195-224.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective action on climate change : the logic of regime failure

AU - HARRIS, Paul G.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - The international climate regime, primarily designed to limit the emissions of pollutants causing global warming, has failed. Why has international cooperation to combat global warming been so difficult, and what factors must change to improve the situation - assuming it is even possible? Using Mancur Olson's classical theory of collective action, this article endeavors to explain the failure of the climate regime. Other international environmental agreements and the associated regimes, such as the Mediterranean Action Plan and the Montreal Protocol on ozone depletion, demonstrate that collective action to address international environmental problems is possible. Both agreements contain the ingredients that classical theory suggests are necessary to achieve collective action. But the flipside of collective action theory - that collective action in larger groups is very difficult or unlikely - can also apply to international agreements and action on climate change. Despite the Mediterranean and Montreal successes, relatively speaking, and in spite of so much effort over two decades to create an effective climate regime, it is by no means apparent that the elements for success will exist for the foreseeable future. We should expect a continued muddling along that may, at best, reduce slightly - but not reverse - global warming at some point in the relatively distant future. Climate change is with us to stay.

AB - The international climate regime, primarily designed to limit the emissions of pollutants causing global warming, has failed. Why has international cooperation to combat global warming been so difficult, and what factors must change to improve the situation - assuming it is even possible? Using Mancur Olson's classical theory of collective action, this article endeavors to explain the failure of the climate regime. Other international environmental agreements and the associated regimes, such as the Mediterranean Action Plan and the Montreal Protocol on ozone depletion, demonstrate that collective action to address international environmental problems is possible. Both agreements contain the ingredients that classical theory suggests are necessary to achieve collective action. But the flipside of collective action theory - that collective action in larger groups is very difficult or unlikely - can also apply to international agreements and action on climate change. Despite the Mediterranean and Montreal successes, relatively speaking, and in spite of so much effort over two decades to create an effective climate regime, it is by no means apparent that the elements for success will exist for the foreseeable future. We should expect a continued muddling along that may, at best, reduce slightly - but not reverse - global warming at some point in the relatively distant future. Climate change is with us to stay.

UR - http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol47/iss1/6

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/7037

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 47

SP - 195

EP - 224

JO - Natural Resources Journal

JF - Natural Resources Journal

SN - 0028-0739

IS - 1

ER -