Comparing syntactic strategies for proximity and distance in the verse/prose comedies of Shakespeare and Jonson

Michael Anthony INGHAM, Richard INGHAM

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

This paper is based on a current collaborative research project related to Shakespearean syntax. While much has been made of the significance of lexis, phonology, grammar and dialectal variation in discursive analysis of the plays, there has been sparse critical concentration on Shakespeare’s syntactic strategies. Culpeper (2001) has drawn attention to the often under-rated significance of syntactic features in Shakespearean texts and suggested that more research is required in this area. He also notes, like Hope (2010) and also Hussey (1988), how syntactic nuances in the Shakespeare text help to establish characterisation. However, such discussion is restricted to instances where syntactic features relate to cognitive organisation of speech. In this paper Shakespearean and Jonsonian comedies spanning the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean period are investigated for the use or non-use of the Verb Second inversion feature with subject pronouns in declarative clauses, where the grammatical subject pronoun inverts round the finite verb standing in second position. It was found that interesting differences distinguish Shakespeare’s and Jonson’s use of this syntactic trait in ways that we associate with their differing authorial stance in relation to contemporary reference.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-67
Number of pages21
JournalMemoria di Shakespeare. A Journal of Shakespearean Studies
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Prose
William Shakespeare
Comedies
Verse
Syntax
Proximity
Subject Pronoun
Syntactic Features
Collaborative Research
Verb Second
Stance
Phonology
Research Projects
Grammatical Subject
Grammar
Lexis
Finite Verb
Discursive
Elizabethan Age
Clause

Keywords

  • Elizabethan and Jacobean comedy
  • Jonson
  • Shakespeare
  • Verb Second inversion
  • early modern English
  • syntax

Cite this

@article{bb600e84df7945aab42b0cd185ececf3,
title = "Comparing syntactic strategies for proximity and distance in the verse/prose comedies of Shakespeare and Jonson",
abstract = "This paper is based on a current collaborative research project related to Shakespearean syntax. While much has been made of the significance of lexis, phonology, grammar and dialectal variation in discursive analysis of the plays, there has been sparse critical concentration on Shakespeare’s syntactic strategies. Culpeper (2001) has drawn attention to the often under-rated significance of syntactic features in Shakespearean texts and suggested that more research is required in this area. He also notes, like Hope (2010) and also Hussey (1988), how syntactic nuances in the Shakespeare text help to establish characterisation. However, such discussion is restricted to instances where syntactic features relate to cognitive organisation of speech. In this paper Shakespearean and Jonsonian comedies spanning the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean period are investigated for the use or non-use of the Verb Second inversion feature with subject pronouns in declarative clauses, where the grammatical subject pronoun inverts round the finite verb standing in second position. It was found that interesting differences distinguish Shakespeare’s and Jonson’s use of this syntactic trait in ways that we associate with their differing authorial stance in relation to contemporary reference.",
keywords = "Elizabethan and Jacobean comedy, Jonson, Shakespeare, Verb Second inversion, early modern English, syntax",
author = "INGHAM, {Michael Anthony} and Richard INGHAM",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "47--67",
journal = "Memoria di Shakespeare. A Journal of Shakespearean Studies",
issn = "2283-8759",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing syntactic strategies for proximity and distance in the verse/prose comedies of Shakespeare and Jonson

AU - INGHAM, Michael Anthony

AU - INGHAM, Richard

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This paper is based on a current collaborative research project related to Shakespearean syntax. While much has been made of the significance of lexis, phonology, grammar and dialectal variation in discursive analysis of the plays, there has been sparse critical concentration on Shakespeare’s syntactic strategies. Culpeper (2001) has drawn attention to the often under-rated significance of syntactic features in Shakespearean texts and suggested that more research is required in this area. He also notes, like Hope (2010) and also Hussey (1988), how syntactic nuances in the Shakespeare text help to establish characterisation. However, such discussion is restricted to instances where syntactic features relate to cognitive organisation of speech. In this paper Shakespearean and Jonsonian comedies spanning the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean period are investigated for the use or non-use of the Verb Second inversion feature with subject pronouns in declarative clauses, where the grammatical subject pronoun inverts round the finite verb standing in second position. It was found that interesting differences distinguish Shakespeare’s and Jonson’s use of this syntactic trait in ways that we associate with their differing authorial stance in relation to contemporary reference.

AB - This paper is based on a current collaborative research project related to Shakespearean syntax. While much has been made of the significance of lexis, phonology, grammar and dialectal variation in discursive analysis of the plays, there has been sparse critical concentration on Shakespeare’s syntactic strategies. Culpeper (2001) has drawn attention to the often under-rated significance of syntactic features in Shakespearean texts and suggested that more research is required in this area. He also notes, like Hope (2010) and also Hussey (1988), how syntactic nuances in the Shakespeare text help to establish characterisation. However, such discussion is restricted to instances where syntactic features relate to cognitive organisation of speech. In this paper Shakespearean and Jonsonian comedies spanning the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean period are investigated for the use or non-use of the Verb Second inversion feature with subject pronouns in declarative clauses, where the grammatical subject pronoun inverts round the finite verb standing in second position. It was found that interesting differences distinguish Shakespeare’s and Jonson’s use of this syntactic trait in ways that we associate with their differing authorial stance in relation to contemporary reference.

KW - Elizabethan and Jacobean comedy

KW - Jonson

KW - Shakespeare

KW - Verb Second inversion

KW - early modern English

KW - syntax

UR - http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/MemShakespeare/article/view/14168/13899

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6470

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 3

SP - 47

EP - 67

JO - Memoria di Shakespeare. A Journal of Shakespearean Studies

JF - Memoria di Shakespeare. A Journal of Shakespearean Studies

SN - 2283-8759

ER -