Comparing the age-friendliness of different neighbourhoods using district surveys : an example from Hong Kong

Moses WONG, Pui Hing CHAU, Yue Lok, Francis CHEUNG, David Rosser PHILLIPS, Jean WOO

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background - To address the age-friendliness of living environment in cities, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the “Age-friendly cities” (AFC) initiative in 2005. To date, however, no universal standard tool for assessing age-friendliness of a community has been agreed.

Methodology - Two quantitative studies on AFC conducted in two Hong Kong districts—Sha Tin and Tuen Mun—were compared. A total of 801 residents aged ≥50 years were interviewed using structured questionnaires based on the WHO’s AFC criteria. District-wide differences in age-friendliness were compared on the basis of eight domain scores. Multiple linear regression was used to examine associations with demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The provision of services and amenities was also compared to help explain the difference in domain scores.

Results - Variations in mean domain scores were observed in both districts. Sha Tin showed significantly lower scores in outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, social participation, respect and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, communication and information, as compared with Tuen Mun. Although a significantly higher score on the housing domain was observed in Sha Tin, differences in community and health services domains were insignificant. Socio-demographic factors, such as age group, gender, area of residence, type of housing, experience of elderly care, employment status, self-rated health and income, were associated with domain scores. However, variations in services and amenities provision appeared not to be strongly associated with district-wide difference in domain scores.

Conclusions - District differences in public opinions towards age-friendly characteristics were observed in this study. Except for two of the eight domains, Sha Tin had significantly lower scores than Tuen Mun. Some socio-demographic indicators seemed predictive to the differences. Paradoxically, Sha Tin had better services and infrastructure and higher socio-economic status, but lower age-friendliness. This warrants detailed research on psychosocial factors that may influence residents’ perceptions of local environments.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0131526
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Tin
Hong Kong
tin
China
Demography
Health
Housing for the Elderly
Economics
Social Participation
demographic statistics
Community Health Services
Public Opinion
Linear regression
Linear Models
Age Groups
Communication
Surveys and Questionnaires
community service
public opinion
Psychology

Bibliographical note

This study was supported by the S. H. Ho Centre for Gerontology and Geriatrics (Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong), and a Direct Grant from Lingnan University, Hong Kong (grant number: DR12A2).

Cite this

@article{69c8e2bb851b49c38d78be146e0130b6,
title = "Comparing the age-friendliness of different neighbourhoods using district surveys : an example from Hong Kong",
abstract = "Background - To address the age-friendliness of living environment in cities, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the “Age-friendly cities” (AFC) initiative in 2005. To date, however, no universal standard tool for assessing age-friendliness of a community has been agreed. Methodology - Two quantitative studies on AFC conducted in two Hong Kong districts—Sha Tin and Tuen Mun—were compared. A total of 801 residents aged ≥50 years were interviewed using structured questionnaires based on the WHO’s AFC criteria. District-wide differences in age-friendliness were compared on the basis of eight domain scores. Multiple linear regression was used to examine associations with demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The provision of services and amenities was also compared to help explain the difference in domain scores.Results - Variations in mean domain scores were observed in both districts. Sha Tin showed significantly lower scores in outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, social participation, respect and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, communication and information, as compared with Tuen Mun. Although a significantly higher score on the housing domain was observed in Sha Tin, differences in community and health services domains were insignificant. Socio-demographic factors, such as age group, gender, area of residence, type of housing, experience of elderly care, employment status, self-rated health and income, were associated with domain scores. However, variations in services and amenities provision appeared not to be strongly associated with district-wide difference in domain scores. Conclusions - District differences in public opinions towards age-friendly characteristics were observed in this study. Except for two of the eight domains, Sha Tin had significantly lower scores than Tuen Mun. Some socio-demographic indicators seemed predictive to the differences. Paradoxically, Sha Tin had better services and infrastructure and higher socio-economic status, but lower age-friendliness. This warrants detailed research on psychosocial factors that may influence residents’ perceptions of local environments.",
author = "Moses WONG and CHAU, {Pui Hing} and CHEUNG, {Yue Lok, Francis} and PHILLIPS, {David Rosser} and Jean WOO",
note = "This study was supported by the S. H. Ho Centre for Gerontology and Geriatrics (Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong), and a Direct Grant from Lingnan University, Hong Kong (grant number: DR12A2).",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0131526",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

Comparing the age-friendliness of different neighbourhoods using district surveys : an example from Hong Kong. / WONG, Moses; CHAU, Pui Hing; CHEUNG, Yue Lok, Francis; PHILLIPS, David Rosser; WOO, Jean.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 10, No. 7, e0131526, 01.07.2015, p. 1-16.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the age-friendliness of different neighbourhoods using district surveys : an example from Hong Kong

AU - WONG, Moses

AU - CHAU, Pui Hing

AU - CHEUNG, Yue Lok, Francis

AU - PHILLIPS, David Rosser

AU - WOO, Jean

N1 - This study was supported by the S. H. Ho Centre for Gerontology and Geriatrics (Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong), and a Direct Grant from Lingnan University, Hong Kong (grant number: DR12A2).

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Background - To address the age-friendliness of living environment in cities, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the “Age-friendly cities” (AFC) initiative in 2005. To date, however, no universal standard tool for assessing age-friendliness of a community has been agreed. Methodology - Two quantitative studies on AFC conducted in two Hong Kong districts—Sha Tin and Tuen Mun—were compared. A total of 801 residents aged ≥50 years were interviewed using structured questionnaires based on the WHO’s AFC criteria. District-wide differences in age-friendliness were compared on the basis of eight domain scores. Multiple linear regression was used to examine associations with demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The provision of services and amenities was also compared to help explain the difference in domain scores.Results - Variations in mean domain scores were observed in both districts. Sha Tin showed significantly lower scores in outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, social participation, respect and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, communication and information, as compared with Tuen Mun. Although a significantly higher score on the housing domain was observed in Sha Tin, differences in community and health services domains were insignificant. Socio-demographic factors, such as age group, gender, area of residence, type of housing, experience of elderly care, employment status, self-rated health and income, were associated with domain scores. However, variations in services and amenities provision appeared not to be strongly associated with district-wide difference in domain scores. Conclusions - District differences in public opinions towards age-friendly characteristics were observed in this study. Except for two of the eight domains, Sha Tin had significantly lower scores than Tuen Mun. Some socio-demographic indicators seemed predictive to the differences. Paradoxically, Sha Tin had better services and infrastructure and higher socio-economic status, but lower age-friendliness. This warrants detailed research on psychosocial factors that may influence residents’ perceptions of local environments.

AB - Background - To address the age-friendliness of living environment in cities, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the “Age-friendly cities” (AFC) initiative in 2005. To date, however, no universal standard tool for assessing age-friendliness of a community has been agreed. Methodology - Two quantitative studies on AFC conducted in two Hong Kong districts—Sha Tin and Tuen Mun—were compared. A total of 801 residents aged ≥50 years were interviewed using structured questionnaires based on the WHO’s AFC criteria. District-wide differences in age-friendliness were compared on the basis of eight domain scores. Multiple linear regression was used to examine associations with demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The provision of services and amenities was also compared to help explain the difference in domain scores.Results - Variations in mean domain scores were observed in both districts. Sha Tin showed significantly lower scores in outdoor spaces and buildings, transportation, social participation, respect and social inclusion, civic participation and employment, communication and information, as compared with Tuen Mun. Although a significantly higher score on the housing domain was observed in Sha Tin, differences in community and health services domains were insignificant. Socio-demographic factors, such as age group, gender, area of residence, type of housing, experience of elderly care, employment status, self-rated health and income, were associated with domain scores. However, variations in services and amenities provision appeared not to be strongly associated with district-wide difference in domain scores. Conclusions - District differences in public opinions towards age-friendly characteristics were observed in this study. Except for two of the eight domains, Sha Tin had significantly lower scores than Tuen Mun. Some socio-demographic indicators seemed predictive to the differences. Paradoxically, Sha Tin had better services and infrastructure and higher socio-economic status, but lower age-friendliness. This warrants detailed research on psychosocial factors that may influence residents’ perceptions of local environments.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1765

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84938847867&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0131526&partnerID=40&md5=a8c0229ccf4e4c311b4442fe135f23e6

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131526

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131526

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

C2 - 26132156

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0131526

ER -