Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of binary coded genetic algorithms with different selection strategies for continuous optimization problems

  • Kang-Di LU
  • , Guo Qiang ZENG*
  • , Jie CHEN
  • , Wen Wen PENG
  • , Zheng Jiang ZHANG
  • , Yu-Xing DAI
  • , Qi WU
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference Proceedings › Conference paper (refereed) › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Just like the crossover and mutation operations, selection operation plays an important role in controlling the performances of genetic algorithms (GA). This paper proposes binary coded genetic algorithms (BCGA) with different selection strategies, such as roulette-wheel, exponential, linear transformation, linear ranking selection, binary tournament selection, power-law based probability selection and threshold selection. Furthermore, the effects of these different selection strategies on the performances of the proposed algorithms are compared and discussed by the experimental results on the benchmark instances of continuous optimization problems. The power-law based probability selection and threshold selection are considered as the most possible competitive selection strategies applied in BCGA for continuous optimization problems while binary tournament selection may be the worst strategy. © 2013 IEEE.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings: 2013 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2013
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages364-368
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781479903337
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes
Event2013 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2013 - Changsha, China
Duration: 7 Nov 2013 → 8 Nov 2013

Congress

Congress2013 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2013
Country/TerritoryChina
CityChangsha
Period7/11/13 → 8/11/13

Keywords

  • Continous optimization problems
  • Genetic algorithms
  • Selection strategies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of binary coded genetic algorithms with different selection strategies for continuous optimization problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this