Concept testing: the state of contemporary practice

Ling PENG, Adam FINN

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to better understand current concept testing practice and its role in the new product development process; identify the relationship, if any, between concept testing design and perceptions of its effectiveness; determine what evidence product managers or research consultants have for the reliability and validity of current concept testing. Design/methodology/approach – A survey of new product managers collected detailed information on their organization's most recent traditional or conjoint concept testing project. In the study of marketing research consultants, 100 firms were asked to provide the publicly available information about the reliability and validity track record of their concept testing services. Findings – There are differences between practices for incrementally and radically new concepts. Practitioners prefer to keep their information proprietary, so little has been learned about how concept tests should be designed, despite the thousands of concepts tested every year. Practical implications – The paper identifies current concept testing practice, including which methods/models are used, what is known about their reliability and validity, and the perceived problems and desired improvements. Originality/value – The paper identifies how concept testing is currently carried out and those issues most in need of future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-674
Number of pages26
JournalMarketing Intelligence and Planning
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Testing
Consultants
Managers
Marketing research
Design methodology
New product development process
New products

Cite this

@article{22e3149b092b4a51a504e6358def66f8,
title = "Concept testing: the state of contemporary practice",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to better understand current concept testing practice and its role in the new product development process; identify the relationship, if any, between concept testing design and perceptions of its effectiveness; determine what evidence product managers or research consultants have for the reliability and validity of current concept testing. Design/methodology/approach – A survey of new product managers collected detailed information on their organization's most recent traditional or conjoint concept testing project. In the study of marketing research consultants, 100 firms were asked to provide the publicly available information about the reliability and validity track record of their concept testing services. Findings – There are differences between practices for incrementally and radically new concepts. Practitioners prefer to keep their information proprietary, so little has been learned about how concept tests should be designed, despite the thousands of concepts tested every year. Practical implications – The paper identifies current concept testing practice, including which methods/models are used, what is known about their reliability and validity, and the perceived problems and desired improvements. Originality/value – The paper identifies how concept testing is currently carried out and those issues most in need of future research.",
author = "Ling PENG and Adam FINN",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/02634500810902884",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "649--674",
journal = "Marketing Intelligence and Planning",
issn = "0263-4503",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Concept testing: the state of contemporary practice. / PENG, Ling; FINN, Adam.

In: Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.01.2008, p. 649-674.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concept testing: the state of contemporary practice

AU - PENG, Ling

AU - FINN, Adam

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to better understand current concept testing practice and its role in the new product development process; identify the relationship, if any, between concept testing design and perceptions of its effectiveness; determine what evidence product managers or research consultants have for the reliability and validity of current concept testing. Design/methodology/approach – A survey of new product managers collected detailed information on their organization's most recent traditional or conjoint concept testing project. In the study of marketing research consultants, 100 firms were asked to provide the publicly available information about the reliability and validity track record of their concept testing services. Findings – There are differences between practices for incrementally and radically new concepts. Practitioners prefer to keep their information proprietary, so little has been learned about how concept tests should be designed, despite the thousands of concepts tested every year. Practical implications – The paper identifies current concept testing practice, including which methods/models are used, what is known about their reliability and validity, and the perceived problems and desired improvements. Originality/value – The paper identifies how concept testing is currently carried out and those issues most in need of future research.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to better understand current concept testing practice and its role in the new product development process; identify the relationship, if any, between concept testing design and perceptions of its effectiveness; determine what evidence product managers or research consultants have for the reliability and validity of current concept testing. Design/methodology/approach – A survey of new product managers collected detailed information on their organization's most recent traditional or conjoint concept testing project. In the study of marketing research consultants, 100 firms were asked to provide the publicly available information about the reliability and validity track record of their concept testing services. Findings – There are differences between practices for incrementally and radically new concepts. Practitioners prefer to keep their information proprietary, so little has been learned about how concept tests should be designed, despite the thousands of concepts tested every year. Practical implications – The paper identifies current concept testing practice, including which methods/models are used, what is known about their reliability and validity, and the perceived problems and desired improvements. Originality/value – The paper identifies how concept testing is currently carried out and those issues most in need of future research.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3779

U2 - 10.1108/02634500810902884

DO - 10.1108/02634500810902884

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 26

SP - 649

EP - 674

JO - Marketing Intelligence and Planning

JF - Marketing Intelligence and Planning

SN - 0263-4503

IS - 6

ER -