Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Globalization and educational restructuring in the Asia Pacific region |
Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
Pages | 333-355 |
Number of pages | 23 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780333770733 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2003 |
Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Conclusion : deep development or deep division? / WELCH, Anthony; MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua.
Globalization and educational restructuring in the Asia Pacific region. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. p. 333-355.Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference Proceedings › Foreword / Postscript › Research
TY - CHAP
T1 - Conclusion : deep development or deep division?
AU - WELCH, Anthony
AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua
PY - 2003/1/1
Y1 - 2003/1/1
N2 - One of the striking features of any current attempt to describe, much less analyse, globalization, is the diffuse set of understandings that underlie patterns of response. Potent illustrations of this diffusion were seen within one fortnight, in September 2001, during which Le Monde Diplomatiquecarried Susan George’s stringent critique of attempts to muzzle opponents of globalization, particularly in the aftermath of the debacle at Genoa (Le Monde Diplomatique, 2001). This was closely followed by coverage of the horrific attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Centre, some of which sought to explain some of the background to the deadly strikes as a response to tensions around rising globalization of American influences (Darwish, 2001; Fisk, 2001; Smith, 2001).1 Yet other commentary sought to imply that opponents of globalization were fellow travellers of terrorism, and hence themselves almost responsible for the catastrophe (IHT, 2001). However one understands these diverse outpourings, it is clearly the case that different models of globalization were being evoked.
AB - One of the striking features of any current attempt to describe, much less analyse, globalization, is the diffuse set of understandings that underlie patterns of response. Potent illustrations of this diffusion were seen within one fortnight, in September 2001, during which Le Monde Diplomatiquecarried Susan George’s stringent critique of attempts to muzzle opponents of globalization, particularly in the aftermath of the debacle at Genoa (Le Monde Diplomatique, 2001). This was closely followed by coverage of the horrific attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Centre, some of which sought to explain some of the background to the deadly strikes as a response to tensions around rising globalization of American influences (Darwish, 2001; Fisk, 2001; Smith, 2001).1 Yet other commentary sought to imply that opponents of globalization were fellow travellers of terrorism, and hence themselves almost responsible for the catastrophe (IHT, 2001). However one understands these diverse outpourings, it is clearly the case that different models of globalization were being evoked.
UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4528
U2 - 10.1057/9781403990488_11
DO - 10.1057/9781403990488_11
M3 - Foreword / Postscript
SN - 9780333770733
SP - 333
EP - 355
BT - Globalization and educational restructuring in the Asia Pacific region
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
ER -