Construct Validity in Automated Counter-Terrorism Analysis

Adrian K. YEE*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Governments and social scientists are increasingly developing machine learning methods to automate the process of identifying terrorists in real-time and predict future attacks. However, current operationalizations of ‘terrorist’ in artificial intelligence are difficult to justify given three issues that remain neglected: insufficient construct legitimacy, insufficient criterion validity, and insufficient construct validity. I conclude that machine learning methods should be at most used for the identification of singular individuals deemed terrorists and not for identifying possible terrorists from some more general class, nor to predict terrorist attacks more broadly, given intolerably high risks that result from such approaches.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Early online date27 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Nov 2024

Keywords

  • philosophy of science
  • terrosim
  • construct validity
  • machine learning
  • philosophy of artificial intelligence
  • political philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Construct Validity in Automated Counter-Terrorism Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this