Conventions and rules in literature

Stein Haugom OLSEN

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Views of what role convention plays in the creation and appreciation of art works gravitate towards two extremes. One view holds that works of art can be apprehended and appreciated as well as created with no reference to convention. The other claims that conventions fully determine how works of art are apprehended and are therefore necessary conditions for the creation of works of art as well as constitutive of appreciation. The former is a version of the Romantic view of art as something that appeals spontaneously to man's most profound emotions, to man's sentient nature, without making use of or needing mediating conventions. The conventionalist view denies that it is possible to respond spontaneously to art. All apprehension and appreciation of art are structured by conventions, and the reader/audience cannot go beyond these conventions because they constitute the experience of the work of art. This paper explains the sense in which the constitutive view may be best understood.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-42
    Number of pages18
    JournalMetaphilosophy
    Volume31
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

    Fingerprint

    Works of Art
    Art
    Apprehension
    Reader
    Emotion

    Cite this

    OLSEN, Stein Haugom. / Conventions and rules in literature. In: Metaphilosophy. 2000 ; Vol. 31, No. 1-2. pp. 25-42.
    @article{927ffe6612bc444eb979ced7256043ef,
    title = "Conventions and rules in literature",
    abstract = "Views of what role convention plays in the creation and appreciation of art works gravitate towards two extremes. One view holds that works of art can be apprehended and appreciated as well as created with no reference to convention. The other claims that conventions fully determine how works of art are apprehended and are therefore necessary conditions for the creation of works of art as well as constitutive of appreciation. The former is a version of the Romantic view of art as something that appeals spontaneously to man's most profound emotions, to man's sentient nature, without making use of or needing mediating conventions. The conventionalist view denies that it is possible to respond spontaneously to art. All apprehension and appreciation of art are structured by conventions, and the reader/audience cannot go beyond these conventions because they constitute the experience of the work of art. This paper explains the sense in which the constitutive view may be best understood.",
    author = "OLSEN, {Stein Haugom}",
    year = "2000",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/1467-9973.00128",
    language = "English",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "25--42",
    journal = "Metaphilosophy",
    issn = "0026-1068",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    Conventions and rules in literature. / OLSEN, Stein Haugom.

    In: Metaphilosophy, Vol. 31, No. 1-2, 01.01.2000, p. 25-42.

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Conventions and rules in literature

    AU - OLSEN, Stein Haugom

    PY - 2000/1/1

    Y1 - 2000/1/1

    N2 - Views of what role convention plays in the creation and appreciation of art works gravitate towards two extremes. One view holds that works of art can be apprehended and appreciated as well as created with no reference to convention. The other claims that conventions fully determine how works of art are apprehended and are therefore necessary conditions for the creation of works of art as well as constitutive of appreciation. The former is a version of the Romantic view of art as something that appeals spontaneously to man's most profound emotions, to man's sentient nature, without making use of or needing mediating conventions. The conventionalist view denies that it is possible to respond spontaneously to art. All apprehension and appreciation of art are structured by conventions, and the reader/audience cannot go beyond these conventions because they constitute the experience of the work of art. This paper explains the sense in which the constitutive view may be best understood.

    AB - Views of what role convention plays in the creation and appreciation of art works gravitate towards two extremes. One view holds that works of art can be apprehended and appreciated as well as created with no reference to convention. The other claims that conventions fully determine how works of art are apprehended and are therefore necessary conditions for the creation of works of art as well as constitutive of appreciation. The former is a version of the Romantic view of art as something that appeals spontaneously to man's most profound emotions, to man's sentient nature, without making use of or needing mediating conventions. The conventionalist view denies that it is possible to respond spontaneously to art. All apprehension and appreciation of art are structured by conventions, and the reader/audience cannot go beyond these conventions because they constitute the experience of the work of art. This paper explains the sense in which the constitutive view may be best understood.

    UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6885

    U2 - 10.1111/1467-9973.00128

    DO - 10.1111/1467-9973.00128

    M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

    VL - 31

    SP - 25

    EP - 42

    JO - Metaphilosophy

    JF - Metaphilosophy

    SN - 0026-1068

    IS - 1-2

    ER -