Credit ratings in China

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The total amount of outstanding corporate bonds in China is relatively low in comparison to other major Asian financial markets. According to PR Newswire (2003), the total outstanding amount in China was RMB1133 billion (about US$16 billion) in 2002, which represents about 1.3% of the country’s GDP compared to at least 10% of the respective GDP in other Asian markets. Although the corporate bond market in China is very underdeveloped, its potential for growth is substantial because the market demand for bond investment is increasing. The considerable growth potentials of the market and surging trends in corporate bonds are substantiated by the research findings from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, China as in February 2003 (PR Newswire, 2003). The findings of this research report by Shenzhen Stock Exchange indicate that, the demand from institutional investors could go up to RMB94 billion (over US$11 billion). On the supply side, corporations would consider raising RMB140 to 279 billion (about US$19.9 to 33.7 billion) from the bond market. In addition, Thomson Financial believes that China is a potentially lucrative market with vast unfilled funding needs (Lunsford, 2004). Until January 2004, the international rating agencies have rated fewer than 100 Chinese firms when there are more than eight million corporations and over 100 banks desiring capital with which to expand (Baglole, 2004; and Lunsford, 2004). If the Chinese regulatory authorities allow foreign credit agencies to rate their domestic bonds and open up the rating industry for more competition, then the opportunity for credit rating business will be huge. At present, Chinese bonds that are offered only to the domestic market do not require international credit ratings, unless they intend to raise capital from international capital markets or to cross-list on a foreign stock exchange. For example, China Petroleum and Chemical Corp. and Huaneng Power International Inc., which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, have requested credit ratings from Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (one of the four “Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations” (NRSROs) in the U.S.). Moreover, none of the foreign credit ratings are officially recognized by the regulatory bodies in China. The World Bank has recommended that China develop a sophisticated bond market to make use of its large amount of private funds and reduce its dependence on infrastructure projects in the State budget (China Daily, 1998b). Rating agencies perform an important role in the development of bond markets. One of the major problems that has hindered the growth of the Chinese bond market is the absence of “authentic” issuer ratings on bonds (China Daily, 1998a). There seems to be a general consensus among Chinese practitioners about the growing need for “authentic” credit ratings for issuers in China’s rating industry (China Daily, 1998b). Kennedy (2003) believes that the domestic credit rating agencies in China have not had any effect on the decisions of investors of Chinese corporate bonds, and he attributes that to Chinese government control of the corporate bond market. Investors do not seem to pay attention to their ratings, and even an AAA rating is of little value to some speculators (Kennedy, 2003). Some investors may ask whether or not a bond issue is guaranteed by the government or not, but are not concerned about its credit rating. If most investors fail to take credit ratings seriously, the development of the rating industry will be slow or even impeded (China Daily, 1998b). The main purpose of this paper to present an in-depth study of the credit ratings in China because they are very crucial to the potentially lucrative, but underdeveloped, Chinese bond market. Section 2 provides the regulatory framework for the bond market and the credit rating industry in China. Their recent developments are reviewed in Section 3. Section 4 describes the major domestic rating agencies, and Section 5 contrasts the long-term issuer ratings that are assigned by local and international rating agencies. The significant issues of the credit ratings in China are discussed in Section 6. The conclusions and recommendations are given in Section 7.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCapital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development
PublisherSpringer
Pages193-206
Number of pages14
Volume15
ISBN (Print)9780387245645
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2005

Fingerprint

China
Credit rating
Rating
Bond market
Corporate bonds
Industry
Rating agencies
Investors
Stock exchange
Shenzhen
Government
Asia
Speculators
Regulatory framework
Credit rating agencies
Funding
Authority
New York Stock Exchange
World Bank
Institutional investors

Cite this

POON, P. H. W. (2005). Credit ratings in China. In Capital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development (Vol. 15, pp. 193-206). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24563-4_13
POON, Pui Han, Winnie. / Credit ratings in China. Capital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development. Vol. 15 Springer, 2005. pp. 193-206
@inbook{db7e60a3292544939f39551709b8c543,
title = "Credit ratings in China",
abstract = "The total amount of outstanding corporate bonds in China is relatively low in comparison to other major Asian financial markets. According to PR Newswire (2003), the total outstanding amount in China was RMB1133 billion (about US$16 billion) in 2002, which represents about 1.3{\%} of the country’s GDP compared to at least 10{\%} of the respective GDP in other Asian markets. Although the corporate bond market in China is very underdeveloped, its potential for growth is substantial because the market demand for bond investment is increasing. The considerable growth potentials of the market and surging trends in corporate bonds are substantiated by the research findings from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, China as in February 2003 (PR Newswire, 2003). The findings of this research report by Shenzhen Stock Exchange indicate that, the demand from institutional investors could go up to RMB94 billion (over US$11 billion). On the supply side, corporations would consider raising RMB140 to 279 billion (about US$19.9 to 33.7 billion) from the bond market. In addition, Thomson Financial believes that China is a potentially lucrative market with vast unfilled funding needs (Lunsford, 2004). Until January 2004, the international rating agencies have rated fewer than 100 Chinese firms when there are more than eight million corporations and over 100 banks desiring capital with which to expand (Baglole, 2004; and Lunsford, 2004). If the Chinese regulatory authorities allow foreign credit agencies to rate their domestic bonds and open up the rating industry for more competition, then the opportunity for credit rating business will be huge. At present, Chinese bonds that are offered only to the domestic market do not require international credit ratings, unless they intend to raise capital from international capital markets or to cross-list on a foreign stock exchange. For example, China Petroleum and Chemical Corp. and Huaneng Power International Inc., which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, have requested credit ratings from Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (one of the four “Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations” (NRSROs) in the U.S.). Moreover, none of the foreign credit ratings are officially recognized by the regulatory bodies in China. The World Bank has recommended that China develop a sophisticated bond market to make use of its large amount of private funds and reduce its dependence on infrastructure projects in the State budget (China Daily, 1998b). Rating agencies perform an important role in the development of bond markets. One of the major problems that has hindered the growth of the Chinese bond market is the absence of “authentic” issuer ratings on bonds (China Daily, 1998a). There seems to be a general consensus among Chinese practitioners about the growing need for “authentic” credit ratings for issuers in China’s rating industry (China Daily, 1998b). Kennedy (2003) believes that the domestic credit rating agencies in China have not had any effect on the decisions of investors of Chinese corporate bonds, and he attributes that to Chinese government control of the corporate bond market. Investors do not seem to pay attention to their ratings, and even an AAA rating is of little value to some speculators (Kennedy, 2003). Some investors may ask whether or not a bond issue is guaranteed by the government or not, but are not concerned about its credit rating. If most investors fail to take credit ratings seriously, the development of the rating industry will be slow or even impeded (China Daily, 1998b). The main purpose of this paper to present an in-depth study of the credit ratings in China because they are very crucial to the potentially lucrative, but underdeveloped, Chinese bond market. Section 2 provides the regulatory framework for the bond market and the credit rating industry in China. Their recent developments are reviewed in Section 3. Section 4 describes the major domestic rating agencies, and Section 5 contrasts the long-term issuer ratings that are assigned by local and international rating agencies. The significant issues of the credit ratings in China are discussed in Section 6. The conclusions and recommendations are given in Section 7.",
author = "POON, {Pui Han, Winnie}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/0-387-24563-4_13",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780387245645",
volume = "15",
pages = "193--206",
booktitle = "Capital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development",
publisher = "Springer",

}

POON, PHW 2005, Credit ratings in China. in Capital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development. vol. 15, Springer, pp. 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24563-4_13

Credit ratings in China. / POON, Pui Han, Winnie.

Capital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development. Vol. 15 Springer, 2005. p. 193-206.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Credit ratings in China

AU - POON, Pui Han, Winnie

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The total amount of outstanding corporate bonds in China is relatively low in comparison to other major Asian financial markets. According to PR Newswire (2003), the total outstanding amount in China was RMB1133 billion (about US$16 billion) in 2002, which represents about 1.3% of the country’s GDP compared to at least 10% of the respective GDP in other Asian markets. Although the corporate bond market in China is very underdeveloped, its potential for growth is substantial because the market demand for bond investment is increasing. The considerable growth potentials of the market and surging trends in corporate bonds are substantiated by the research findings from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, China as in February 2003 (PR Newswire, 2003). The findings of this research report by Shenzhen Stock Exchange indicate that, the demand from institutional investors could go up to RMB94 billion (over US$11 billion). On the supply side, corporations would consider raising RMB140 to 279 billion (about US$19.9 to 33.7 billion) from the bond market. In addition, Thomson Financial believes that China is a potentially lucrative market with vast unfilled funding needs (Lunsford, 2004). Until January 2004, the international rating agencies have rated fewer than 100 Chinese firms when there are more than eight million corporations and over 100 banks desiring capital with which to expand (Baglole, 2004; and Lunsford, 2004). If the Chinese regulatory authorities allow foreign credit agencies to rate their domestic bonds and open up the rating industry for more competition, then the opportunity for credit rating business will be huge. At present, Chinese bonds that are offered only to the domestic market do not require international credit ratings, unless they intend to raise capital from international capital markets or to cross-list on a foreign stock exchange. For example, China Petroleum and Chemical Corp. and Huaneng Power International Inc., which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, have requested credit ratings from Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (one of the four “Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations” (NRSROs) in the U.S.). Moreover, none of the foreign credit ratings are officially recognized by the regulatory bodies in China. The World Bank has recommended that China develop a sophisticated bond market to make use of its large amount of private funds and reduce its dependence on infrastructure projects in the State budget (China Daily, 1998b). Rating agencies perform an important role in the development of bond markets. One of the major problems that has hindered the growth of the Chinese bond market is the absence of “authentic” issuer ratings on bonds (China Daily, 1998a). There seems to be a general consensus among Chinese practitioners about the growing need for “authentic” credit ratings for issuers in China’s rating industry (China Daily, 1998b). Kennedy (2003) believes that the domestic credit rating agencies in China have not had any effect on the decisions of investors of Chinese corporate bonds, and he attributes that to Chinese government control of the corporate bond market. Investors do not seem to pay attention to their ratings, and even an AAA rating is of little value to some speculators (Kennedy, 2003). Some investors may ask whether or not a bond issue is guaranteed by the government or not, but are not concerned about its credit rating. If most investors fail to take credit ratings seriously, the development of the rating industry will be slow or even impeded (China Daily, 1998b). The main purpose of this paper to present an in-depth study of the credit ratings in China because they are very crucial to the potentially lucrative, but underdeveloped, Chinese bond market. Section 2 provides the regulatory framework for the bond market and the credit rating industry in China. Their recent developments are reviewed in Section 3. Section 4 describes the major domestic rating agencies, and Section 5 contrasts the long-term issuer ratings that are assigned by local and international rating agencies. The significant issues of the credit ratings in China are discussed in Section 6. The conclusions and recommendations are given in Section 7.

AB - The total amount of outstanding corporate bonds in China is relatively low in comparison to other major Asian financial markets. According to PR Newswire (2003), the total outstanding amount in China was RMB1133 billion (about US$16 billion) in 2002, which represents about 1.3% of the country’s GDP compared to at least 10% of the respective GDP in other Asian markets. Although the corporate bond market in China is very underdeveloped, its potential for growth is substantial because the market demand for bond investment is increasing. The considerable growth potentials of the market and surging trends in corporate bonds are substantiated by the research findings from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, China as in February 2003 (PR Newswire, 2003). The findings of this research report by Shenzhen Stock Exchange indicate that, the demand from institutional investors could go up to RMB94 billion (over US$11 billion). On the supply side, corporations would consider raising RMB140 to 279 billion (about US$19.9 to 33.7 billion) from the bond market. In addition, Thomson Financial believes that China is a potentially lucrative market with vast unfilled funding needs (Lunsford, 2004). Until January 2004, the international rating agencies have rated fewer than 100 Chinese firms when there are more than eight million corporations and over 100 banks desiring capital with which to expand (Baglole, 2004; and Lunsford, 2004). If the Chinese regulatory authorities allow foreign credit agencies to rate their domestic bonds and open up the rating industry for more competition, then the opportunity for credit rating business will be huge. At present, Chinese bonds that are offered only to the domestic market do not require international credit ratings, unless they intend to raise capital from international capital markets or to cross-list on a foreign stock exchange. For example, China Petroleum and Chemical Corp. and Huaneng Power International Inc., which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, have requested credit ratings from Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (one of the four “Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations” (NRSROs) in the U.S.). Moreover, none of the foreign credit ratings are officially recognized by the regulatory bodies in China. The World Bank has recommended that China develop a sophisticated bond market to make use of its large amount of private funds and reduce its dependence on infrastructure projects in the State budget (China Daily, 1998b). Rating agencies perform an important role in the development of bond markets. One of the major problems that has hindered the growth of the Chinese bond market is the absence of “authentic” issuer ratings on bonds (China Daily, 1998a). There seems to be a general consensus among Chinese practitioners about the growing need for “authentic” credit ratings for issuers in China’s rating industry (China Daily, 1998b). Kennedy (2003) believes that the domestic credit rating agencies in China have not had any effect on the decisions of investors of Chinese corporate bonds, and he attributes that to Chinese government control of the corporate bond market. Investors do not seem to pay attention to their ratings, and even an AAA rating is of little value to some speculators (Kennedy, 2003). Some investors may ask whether or not a bond issue is guaranteed by the government or not, but are not concerned about its credit rating. If most investors fail to take credit ratings seriously, the development of the rating industry will be slow or even impeded (China Daily, 1998b). The main purpose of this paper to present an in-depth study of the credit ratings in China because they are very crucial to the potentially lucrative, but underdeveloped, Chinese bond market. Section 2 provides the regulatory framework for the bond market and the credit rating industry in China. Their recent developments are reviewed in Section 3. Section 4 describes the major domestic rating agencies, and Section 5 contrasts the long-term issuer ratings that are assigned by local and international rating agencies. The significant issues of the credit ratings in China are discussed in Section 6. The conclusions and recommendations are given in Section 7.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3101

U2 - 10.1007/0-387-24563-4_13

DO - 10.1007/0-387-24563-4_13

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780387245645

VL - 15

SP - 193

EP - 206

BT - Capital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development

PB - Springer

ER -

POON PHW. Credit ratings in China. In Capital Markets, Globalization, and Economic Development. Vol. 15. Springer. 2005. p. 193-206 https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24563-4_13