Crisis politics in authoritarian regimes : how crises catalyse changes under the state-society interactive framework

Hin-yeung CHAN

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most studies and research on crisis management and government crises focus on nations that are advanced and democratic. Through the institutionalized mechanism of voting, the public can respond to a government's handling of a crisis without destabilizing the democratic system of government. However, the consequences of crises, particularly governance crises, in authoritarian regimes have not been adequately addressed. Drawing upon different frameworks in the field, this paper proposes a heuristic crisis development ladder and a state-society interactive framework more relevant for studying crisis management in authoritarian nations such as China. By focusing on the catalytic effect of crisis that accelerates reforms and changes, this paper argues that critical crises are politically powerful and decisive in authoritarian systems, especially in the context of an increasingly proactive civil society. This paper illustrates the crisis provoking politics that influences decision-making under non-democratic rule.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-210
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Volume21
Issue number4
Early online date15 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

crisis management
politics
Ladders
Decision making
civil society
heuristics
decision making
society
Government
effect
voting
public

Cite this

@article{04b0aed457084daba09a80bd33c33a56,
title = "Crisis politics in authoritarian regimes : how crises catalyse changes under the state-society interactive framework",
abstract = "Most studies and research on crisis management and government crises focus on nations that are advanced and democratic. Through the institutionalized mechanism of voting, the public can respond to a government's handling of a crisis without destabilizing the democratic system of government. However, the consequences of crises, particularly governance crises, in authoritarian regimes have not been adequately addressed. Drawing upon different frameworks in the field, this paper proposes a heuristic crisis development ladder and a state-society interactive framework more relevant for studying crisis management in authoritarian nations such as China. By focusing on the catalytic effect of crisis that accelerates reforms and changes, this paper argues that critical crises are politically powerful and decisive in authoritarian systems, especially in the context of an increasingly proactive civil society. This paper illustrates the crisis provoking politics that influences decision-making under non-democratic rule.",
author = "Hin-yeung CHAN",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/1468-5973.12024",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "200--210",
journal = "Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management",
issn = "0966-0879",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Crisis politics in authoritarian regimes : how crises catalyse changes under the state-society interactive framework. / CHAN, Hin-yeung.

In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 200-210.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crisis politics in authoritarian regimes : how crises catalyse changes under the state-society interactive framework

AU - CHAN, Hin-yeung

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Most studies and research on crisis management and government crises focus on nations that are advanced and democratic. Through the institutionalized mechanism of voting, the public can respond to a government's handling of a crisis without destabilizing the democratic system of government. However, the consequences of crises, particularly governance crises, in authoritarian regimes have not been adequately addressed. Drawing upon different frameworks in the field, this paper proposes a heuristic crisis development ladder and a state-society interactive framework more relevant for studying crisis management in authoritarian nations such as China. By focusing on the catalytic effect of crisis that accelerates reforms and changes, this paper argues that critical crises are politically powerful and decisive in authoritarian systems, especially in the context of an increasingly proactive civil society. This paper illustrates the crisis provoking politics that influences decision-making under non-democratic rule.

AB - Most studies and research on crisis management and government crises focus on nations that are advanced and democratic. Through the institutionalized mechanism of voting, the public can respond to a government's handling of a crisis without destabilizing the democratic system of government. However, the consequences of crises, particularly governance crises, in authoritarian regimes have not been adequately addressed. Drawing upon different frameworks in the field, this paper proposes a heuristic crisis development ladder and a state-society interactive framework more relevant for studying crisis management in authoritarian nations such as China. By focusing on the catalytic effect of crisis that accelerates reforms and changes, this paper argues that critical crises are politically powerful and decisive in authoritarian systems, especially in the context of an increasingly proactive civil society. This paper illustrates the crisis provoking politics that influences decision-making under non-democratic rule.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6561

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?scp=84887174675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1468-5973.12024

DO - 10.1111/1468-5973.12024

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 21

SP - 200

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management

JF - Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management

SN - 0966-0879

IS - 4

ER -