Cross-field effect and institutional habitus formation

self-reinforcing inequality in Chinese higher education system

Xiao HAN

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

Bourdieu’s concept of field offers an alternative explanation for the inevitable gap between policy initiative and implementation. While the existing literature mostly concentrated on the dichotomy of macro- and micro-politics in enacting education policies, the missing attention to meso-level, local governments as policy interpreters and implementers in some developing countries with a vast territory, China and Russia, for example, has hindered deeper exploration in policy studies. Adopting cross-field effects as the theoretical base and applying Bourdieu's conceptual triad as a whole, rather than considering habitus, practice, or field separately, this study examines Chinese transnational higher education (TNHE) policy enactment by subnational authorities, aiming to: first, contextualize Bourdieu's theoretical and empirical approaches in various political/economic systems while consider the policy practice at meso-level; second, demonstrate the essentiality of conversation rate and standard of capitals in field analysis; and third, based on these analyses, explore the formation of institutional habitus as a way of explaining the perennial inequality in the Chinese higher education (HE) system. The paper concludes with a theoretical reflection that Bourdieu’s ever-developing definition of habitus and the criticism of his unavoidable relapse to objectivism result from the indiscriminate use of individual and institutional habitus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-294
JournalJournal of Education Policy
Volume34
Issue number2
Early online date30 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

meso level
education system
micro-politics
policy studies
relapse
interpreter
economic system
political system
education
conversation
criticism
Russia
developing country
China
politics
literature

Keywords

  • Bourdieu
  • cross-field effects
  • institutional habitus
  • meso-level
  • standard and conversion rate of capitals
  • transnational higher education

Cite this

@article{0d43761ca1654a7a9dd722f30473d4ab,
title = "Cross-field effect and institutional habitus formation: self-reinforcing inequality in Chinese higher education system",
abstract = "Bourdieu’s concept of field offers an alternative explanation for the inevitable gap between policy initiative and implementation. While the existing literature mostly concentrated on the dichotomy of macro- and micro-politics in enacting education policies, the missing attention to meso-level, local governments as policy interpreters and implementers in some developing countries with a vast territory, China and Russia, for example, has hindered deeper exploration in policy studies. Adopting cross-field effects as the theoretical base and applying Bourdieu's conceptual triad as a whole, rather than considering habitus, practice, or field separately, this study examines Chinese transnational higher education (TNHE) policy enactment by subnational authorities, aiming to: first, contextualize Bourdieu's theoretical and empirical approaches in various political/economic systems while consider the policy practice at meso-level; second, demonstrate the essentiality of conversation rate and standard of capitals in field analysis; and third, based on these analyses, explore the formation of institutional habitus as a way of explaining the perennial inequality in the Chinese higher education (HE) system. The paper concludes with a theoretical reflection that Bourdieu’s ever-developing definition of habitus and the criticism of his unavoidable relapse to objectivism result from the indiscriminate use of individual and institutional habitus.",
keywords = "Bourdieu, cross-field effects, institutional habitus, meso-level, standard and conversion rate of capitals, transnational higher education",
author = "Xiao HAN",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02680939.2018.1456676",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "267--294",
journal = "Journal of Education Policy",
issn = "0268-0939",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Cross-field effect and institutional habitus formation : self-reinforcing inequality in Chinese higher education system. / HAN, Xiao.

In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 34, No. 2, 03.2019, p. 267-294.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-field effect and institutional habitus formation

T2 - self-reinforcing inequality in Chinese higher education system

AU - HAN, Xiao

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Bourdieu’s concept of field offers an alternative explanation for the inevitable gap between policy initiative and implementation. While the existing literature mostly concentrated on the dichotomy of macro- and micro-politics in enacting education policies, the missing attention to meso-level, local governments as policy interpreters and implementers in some developing countries with a vast territory, China and Russia, for example, has hindered deeper exploration in policy studies. Adopting cross-field effects as the theoretical base and applying Bourdieu's conceptual triad as a whole, rather than considering habitus, practice, or field separately, this study examines Chinese transnational higher education (TNHE) policy enactment by subnational authorities, aiming to: first, contextualize Bourdieu's theoretical and empirical approaches in various political/economic systems while consider the policy practice at meso-level; second, demonstrate the essentiality of conversation rate and standard of capitals in field analysis; and third, based on these analyses, explore the formation of institutional habitus as a way of explaining the perennial inequality in the Chinese higher education (HE) system. The paper concludes with a theoretical reflection that Bourdieu’s ever-developing definition of habitus and the criticism of his unavoidable relapse to objectivism result from the indiscriminate use of individual and institutional habitus.

AB - Bourdieu’s concept of field offers an alternative explanation for the inevitable gap between policy initiative and implementation. While the existing literature mostly concentrated on the dichotomy of macro- and micro-politics in enacting education policies, the missing attention to meso-level, local governments as policy interpreters and implementers in some developing countries with a vast territory, China and Russia, for example, has hindered deeper exploration in policy studies. Adopting cross-field effects as the theoretical base and applying Bourdieu's conceptual triad as a whole, rather than considering habitus, practice, or field separately, this study examines Chinese transnational higher education (TNHE) policy enactment by subnational authorities, aiming to: first, contextualize Bourdieu's theoretical and empirical approaches in various political/economic systems while consider the policy practice at meso-level; second, demonstrate the essentiality of conversation rate and standard of capitals in field analysis; and third, based on these analyses, explore the formation of institutional habitus as a way of explaining the perennial inequality in the Chinese higher education (HE) system. The paper concludes with a theoretical reflection that Bourdieu’s ever-developing definition of habitus and the criticism of his unavoidable relapse to objectivism result from the indiscriminate use of individual and institutional habitus.

KW - Bourdieu

KW - cross-field effects

KW - institutional habitus

KW - meso-level

KW - standard and conversion rate of capitals

KW - transnational higher education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044574870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02680939.2018.1456676

DO - 10.1080/02680939.2018.1456676

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 34

SP - 267

EP - 294

JO - Journal of Education Policy

JF - Journal of Education Policy

SN - 0268-0939

IS - 2

ER -