Cultural difference in the application of the diagnosticity principle to schematic faces

Guomei ZHOU, Xiaolan FU*, William G. HAYWARD, Vance LOCKE, Elizabeth PELLICANO

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


Tversky's (1977) diagnosticity principle implies that categorization affects similarity, and that similarity in turn is based on context. However, Nisbett, Peng, Choi, and Norenzayan (2001) suggest that Chinese and Westerners differ in their sensitivity to context and categorization. Because of these differences, it is not clear whether Chinese should follow the diagnosticity principle. To explore these possibilities, we conducted a cross-cultural experiment using participants from Australia and China to repeat the experiment of Tversky (1977) using schematic faces as stimuli. Results showed that Australians, but not Chinese, made similarity judgments in a manner compatible with the diagnosticity principle. We suggest that: 1) the use of the diagnosticity principle depends upon contextual variables for Chinese people; and 2) Chinese participants judged neutral schematic faces as more positive than Western participants did.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)240-247
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cognition and Culture
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by the fund of 973 Program of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2002CB312103), the fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (60433030), and the fund of Chinese Academy of Sciences to the second author.


Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural difference in the application of the diagnosticity principle to schematic faces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this