Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cultural differences in the personality triad: The interplay of personality traits, situation characteristics, and behavioral states around the world

  • International Situations Project
  • , Niclas KUPER*
  • , Gwendolyn GARDINER
  • , Erica BARANSKI
  • , David C. FUNDER
  • , John F. RAUTHMANN
  • , Victoria Wai-Lan YEUNG
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Understanding the interplay of persons, situations, and behavior (the Personality Triad) is a key task of psychology. However, previous research has largely focused on Western samples. We examined the Personality Triad across cultures with N = 15,221 participants from 61 countries and one geographic region. Participants reported on one situation from their daily lives. We examined (a) situation characteristic–behavioral state, (b) trait–behavioral state, and (c) trait–situation characteristic associations, as well as (d) Trait × Situation Characteristic interactions predicting behavioral states. We focused on six traits (Big Five, Honesty-Humility), seven situation characteristics (Duty, Intellect, Adversity, Mating, pOsitivity, Negativity, Sociality), and three self-reported behavioral states (Agency, Enthusiasm, Self-Negativity). Importantly, we included 15 country-level variables (collectivism, self-construal, cultural value orientations, tightness, independent and interdependent happiness, national socioeconomic status) as moderators that might contribute to country differences in the Personality Triad. Bayesian multilevel models showed sizable and expected situation characteristic–behavioral state and trait–behavioral state associations with a high degree of generalization across countries, some cultural differences, and moderator effects contradicting theoretical expectations. For instance, we found weaker situation characteristic effects in collectivistic cultures and stronger trait effects in embedded cultures. Trait–situation characteristic associations were meaningful but smaller, and Trait × Situation Characteristic interactions were small and less often significant (although we observed some expected interactions). We found little evidence for country differences in the latter two relations. We discuss implications and future directions for cross-cultural work on the Personality Triad, including replications and extensions using intensive longitudinal designs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Early online date2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2026

Funding

The International Situations Project was supported by the Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, Grant BCS-1528131 (principal investigator: David C. Funder). Additionally, the data collection in the Czech Republic was supported by Grant 23-06170S from the Czech Science Foundation and by institutional research funding RVO 68081740 from the Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences. Further funding came from the Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (ANID/FONDAP/ 15130009) and the Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (ANID/ FONDAP/15110006), awarded to Roberto González.

Keywords

  • Personality Triad
  • Culture
  • Person × Situation Interactions
  • Person-Environment Relations
  • Situation Characteristics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural differences in the personality triad: The interplay of personality traits, situation characteristics, and behavioral states around the world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this